为实验数据建模的分布式工作流

V. Lynch, Jose Borreguero Calvo, E. Deelman, Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Monojoy Goswami, Yawei Hui, E. Lingerfelt, J. Vetter
{"title":"为实验数据建模的分布式工作流","authors":"V. Lynch, Jose Borreguero Calvo, E. Deelman, Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Monojoy Goswami, Yawei Hui, E. Lingerfelt, J. Vetter","doi":"10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modeling helps explain the fundamental physics hidden behind experimental data. In the case of material modeling, running one simulation rarely results in output that reproduces the experimental data. Often one or more of the force field parameters are not precisely known and must be optimized for the output to match that of the experiment. Since the simulations require high performance computing (HPC) resources and there are usually many simulations to run, a workflow is very useful to prevent errors and assure that the simulations are identical except for the parameters that need to be varied. The use of HPC implies distributed workflows, but the optimization and steps to compare the simulation results and experimental data are done on a local workstation. We will present results from force field refinement of data collected at the Spallation Neutron Source using Kepler, Pegasus, and BEAM workflows and discuss what we have learned from using these workflows.","PeriodicalId":364903,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed workflows for modeling experimental data\",\"authors\":\"V. Lynch, Jose Borreguero Calvo, E. Deelman, Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Monojoy Goswami, Yawei Hui, E. Lingerfelt, J. Vetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modeling helps explain the fundamental physics hidden behind experimental data. In the case of material modeling, running one simulation rarely results in output that reproduces the experimental data. Often one or more of the force field parameters are not precisely known and must be optimized for the output to match that of the experiment. Since the simulations require high performance computing (HPC) resources and there are usually many simulations to run, a workflow is very useful to prevent errors and assure that the simulations are identical except for the parameters that need to be varied. The use of HPC implies distributed workflows, but the optimization and steps to compare the simulation results and experimental data are done on a local workstation. We will present results from force field refinement of data collected at the Spallation Neutron Source using Kepler, Pegasus, and BEAM workflows and discuss what we have learned from using these workflows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

建模有助于解释隐藏在实验数据背后的基本物理原理。在材料建模的情况下,运行一个模拟很少会产生再现实验数据的输出。通常一个或多个力场参数是不精确已知的,必须优化输出以匹配实验结果。由于模拟需要高性能计算(HPC)资源,并且通常有许多模拟要运行,工作流对于防止错误和确保模拟除了需要改变的参数外是相同的非常有用。HPC的使用意味着分布式工作流程,但优化和比较仿真结果和实验数据的步骤是在本地工作站完成的。我们将介绍使用Kepler、Pegasus和BEAM工作流程在散裂中子源收集的数据的力场细化结果,并讨论我们从使用这些工作流程中学到的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distributed workflows for modeling experimental data
Modeling helps explain the fundamental physics hidden behind experimental data. In the case of material modeling, running one simulation rarely results in output that reproduces the experimental data. Often one or more of the force field parameters are not precisely known and must be optimized for the output to match that of the experiment. Since the simulations require high performance computing (HPC) resources and there are usually many simulations to run, a workflow is very useful to prevent errors and assure that the simulations are identical except for the parameters that need to be varied. The use of HPC implies distributed workflows, but the optimization and steps to compare the simulation results and experimental data are done on a local workstation. We will present results from force field refinement of data collected at the Spallation Neutron Source using Kepler, Pegasus, and BEAM workflows and discuss what we have learned from using these workflows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信