全球再分配中的开放与平等权衡

IF 3.8 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Economic Journal Pub Date : 2018-01-17 DOI:10.1111/ecoj.12469

E. Glen Weyl

{"title":"全球再分配中的开放与平等权衡","authors":"E. Glen Weyl","doi":"10.1111/ecoj.12469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries accept massive numbers of migrants from poor countries and pay wages that dramatically improve over outside options but are meagre by the standards of natives. As such they do dramatically more per capita to reduce global inequality than do the ‘fortress welfare states’ of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. If OECD countries were to imitate the GCC it would reduce global inequality by more than full equalisation within the OECD would. Such examples suggest a philosophically disturbing trade-off between openness to global inequality-reducing migration and internal equality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48448,"journal":{"name":"Economic Journal","volume":"128 612","pages":"F1-F36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ecoj.12469","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Openness-equality Trade-off in Global Redistribution\",\"authors\":\"E. Glen Weyl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecoj.12469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries accept massive numbers of migrants from poor countries and pay wages that dramatically improve over outside options but are meagre by the standards of natives. As such they do dramatically more per capita to reduce global inequality than do the ‘fortress welfare states’ of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. If OECD countries were to imitate the GCC it would reduce global inequality by more than full equalisation within the OECD would. Such examples suggest a philosophically disturbing trade-off between openness to global inequality-reducing migration and internal equality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"128 612\",\"pages\":\"F1-F36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ecoj.12469\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecoj.12469\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecoj.12469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24

摘要

海湾合作委员会(GCC)成员国接受了大量来自贫穷国家的移民，支付的工资大大高于外部选择，但与当地人的标准相比却很低。因此，与经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的“堡垒福利国家”相比，它们在减少全球不平等方面的人均贡献要大得多。如果经合组织国家效仿海湾合作委员会，其减少全球不平等的效果将超过经合组织内部完全平等的效果。这些例子表明，在对减少全球不平等的移民开放和内部平等之间，存在一种哲学上令人不安的权衡。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Openness-equality Trade-off in Global Redistribution

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries accept massive numbers of migrants from poor countries and pay wages that dramatically improve over outside options but are meagre by the standards of natives. As such they do dramatically more per capita to reduce global inequality than do the ‘fortress welfare states’ of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. If OECD countries were to imitate the GCC it would reduce global inequality by more than full equalisation within the OECD would. Such examples suggest a philosophically disturbing trade-off between openness to global inequality-reducing migration and internal equality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economic Journal ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

3.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Economic Journal is the Royal Economic Society''s flagship title, and is one of the founding journals of modern economics. Over the past 125 years the journal has provided a platform for high quality and imaginative economic research, earning a worldwide reputation excellence as a general journal publishing papers in all fields of economics for a broad international readership. It is invaluable to anyone with an active interest in economic issues and is a key source for professional economists in higher education, business, government and the financial sector who want to keep abreast of current thinking in economics.