挖掘、显示和翻译:以内容为中心的反馈,由隐喻驱动

Sara Doan
{"title":"挖掘、显示和翻译:以内容为中心的反馈,由隐喻驱动","authors":"Sara Doan","doi":"10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While previous studies have noted how instructors comment on students’ content, more attention should be given to how instructors give feedback on abstract issues of content, detail, and information. In this study, I interviewed 20 instructors about feedback they had given on students’ resumes and cover letters; I used critical discourse analysis to code the interviews. Instructors’ mentions of content, detail, and information formed six major themes: providing and expressing information, orienting audiences, seeing information, finding information, considering detail, and revising content. Instructors often framed as a deficit, for example, a lack of information; however, when students included appropriate or meaningful content, instructors praised students. Better understanding how instructors teach students to understand, analyze, and communicate information connects students with the types of problem-solving skills necessary for today’s changing workplaces.","PeriodicalId":311057,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digging, Displaying, and Translating: Content-Centric Feedback, Powered by Metaphors\",\"authors\":\"Sara Doan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While previous studies have noted how instructors comment on students’ content, more attention should be given to how instructors give feedback on abstract issues of content, detail, and information. In this study, I interviewed 20 instructors about feedback they had given on students’ resumes and cover letters; I used critical discourse analysis to code the interviews. Instructors’ mentions of content, detail, and information formed six major themes: providing and expressing information, orienting audiences, seeing information, finding information, considering detail, and revising content. Instructors often framed as a deficit, for example, a lack of information; however, when students included appropriate or meaningful content, instructors praised students. Better understanding how instructors teach students to understand, analyze, and communicate information connects students with the types of problem-solving skills necessary for today’s changing workplaces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm48883.2020.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然以前的研究已经注意到教师如何评论学生的内容,但应该更多地关注教师如何对内容、细节和信息等抽象问题进行反馈。在这项研究中,我采访了20位教师,询问他们对学生简历和求职信的反馈;我使用批判性话语分析来编码采访。讲师对内容、细节和信息的提及形成了六大主题:提供和表达信息、引导受众、看到信息、发现信息、考虑细节和修改内容。教师经常被认为是缺陷,例如,缺乏信息;然而,当学生提交适当或有意义的内容时,教师会表扬学生。更好地了解教师如何教学生理解、分析和交流信息,将学生与当今不断变化的工作场所所必需的解决问题的技能联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digging, Displaying, and Translating: Content-Centric Feedback, Powered by Metaphors
While previous studies have noted how instructors comment on students’ content, more attention should be given to how instructors give feedback on abstract issues of content, detail, and information. In this study, I interviewed 20 instructors about feedback they had given on students’ resumes and cover letters; I used critical discourse analysis to code the interviews. Instructors’ mentions of content, detail, and information formed six major themes: providing and expressing information, orienting audiences, seeing information, finding information, considering detail, and revising content. Instructors often framed as a deficit, for example, a lack of information; however, when students included appropriate or meaningful content, instructors praised students. Better understanding how instructors teach students to understand, analyze, and communicate information connects students with the types of problem-solving skills necessary for today’s changing workplaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信