Rifdhani Fakhrudin Nur, Erlangga Prasamya, Arief Ikhwandi, P. Utomo, Sudadi
{"title":"基本生命支持训练:远程学习方法的有效性和保留性","authors":"Rifdhani Fakhrudin Nur, Erlangga Prasamya, Arief Ikhwandi, P. Utomo, Sudadi","doi":"10.20473/ijar.v5i12023.18-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Basic Life Support (BLS) training during the COVID-19 pandemic needed to be effective as well as prevent disease transmission between trainers and participants. The distance-learning method is one of the recommended modified training methods. However, there is still limited research that evaluates the effectiveness of the distance-learning method for BLS training for laypersons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and retention of the distance-learning method for BLS training in improving the participant’s knowledge and skills. Materials and Methods: This is a non-randomized quasi-experimental study (one group pre-test and post-test design). A total of 64 TAGANA (Taruna Siaga Bencana/disaster volunteer) members of Sleman Regency who had undergone the distance learning method for BLS training were the participants of this study. A knowledge questionnaire and observation checklist were prepared and tested for context validity by an expert group. Data on the participant’s knowledge were collected before and after the training session, and data on the participant’s skills were recorded after the training session. After the training, a social media group was created to provide a periodical refresher of the BLS materials and facilitate discussions between the speakers and the study’s samples. Data on knowledge retention and skills were recorded six months post-training. Results: The distance-learning method for BLS training effectively increased the participants' knowledge of BLS, indicated by a significantly higher final knowledge score than before the training (Z=-6.904, p <0.001). The method also provided sufficient BLS skills, indicated by most of the samples (93.7%) passing the skill observation test even though no participant had attended a similar training before. Moreover, the participant’s knowledge and skills scores were significantly lower six months after the training session than immediately after training (Z=-5.157, p <0.001; Z=-4.219, p <0.001). Conclusion: The distance-learning method for BLS training effectively increased the participant’s BLS knowledge and skills. However, their knowledge and skills decreased at six months post-training. Overall, the distance-learning method has been proven as a promising alternative to BLS training during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":117902,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basic Life Support Training: The Effectiveness and Retention of The Distance-Learning Method\",\"authors\":\"Rifdhani Fakhrudin Nur, Erlangga Prasamya, Arief Ikhwandi, P. Utomo, Sudadi\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ijar.v5i12023.18-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Basic Life Support (BLS) training during the COVID-19 pandemic needed to be effective as well as prevent disease transmission between trainers and participants. The distance-learning method is one of the recommended modified training methods. However, there is still limited research that evaluates the effectiveness of the distance-learning method for BLS training for laypersons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and retention of the distance-learning method for BLS training in improving the participant’s knowledge and skills. Materials and Methods: This is a non-randomized quasi-experimental study (one group pre-test and post-test design). A total of 64 TAGANA (Taruna Siaga Bencana/disaster volunteer) members of Sleman Regency who had undergone the distance learning method for BLS training were the participants of this study. A knowledge questionnaire and observation checklist were prepared and tested for context validity by an expert group. Data on the participant’s knowledge were collected before and after the training session, and data on the participant’s skills were recorded after the training session. After the training, a social media group was created to provide a periodical refresher of the BLS materials and facilitate discussions between the speakers and the study’s samples. Data on knowledge retention and skills were recorded six months post-training. Results: The distance-learning method for BLS training effectively increased the participants' knowledge of BLS, indicated by a significantly higher final knowledge score than before the training (Z=-6.904, p <0.001). The method also provided sufficient BLS skills, indicated by most of the samples (93.7%) passing the skill observation test even though no participant had attended a similar training before. Moreover, the participant’s knowledge and skills scores were significantly lower six months after the training session than immediately after training (Z=-5.157, p <0.001; Z=-4.219, p <0.001). Conclusion: The distance-learning method for BLS training effectively increased the participant’s BLS knowledge and skills. However, their knowledge and skills decreased at six months post-training. Overall, the distance-learning method has been proven as a promising alternative to BLS training during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijar.v5i12023.18-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ijar.v5i12023.18-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:COVID-19大流行期间的基本生命支持(BLS)培训需要有效,并防止培训人员和参与者之间的疾病传播。远程学习方法是一种被推荐的改良训练方法。然而,在COVID-19大流行期间,评估远程学习方法对非专业人员进行劳工统计局培训的有效性的研究仍然有限。目的:评价远程学习方法在劳工统计局培训中提高被试知识和技能的有效性和保持性。材料与方法:本研究为非随机准实验研究(一组前测和后测设计)。本研究以64名接受过BLS远程学习培训的Sleman Regency的TAGANA (Taruna Siaga benana /disaster volunteer)成员为研究对象。准备了知识问卷和观察清单,并由专家组进行了上下文效度测试。在培训之前和之后收集参与者的知识数据,在培训之后记录参与者的技能数据。培训结束后,成立了一个社交媒体小组,定期更新劳工统计局的材料,并促进演讲者与研究样本之间的讨论。培训后6个月记录知识保留和技能的数据。结果:远程学习方式的BLS训练有效提高了被试对BLS的知识,最终知识得分显著高于训练前(Z=-6.904, p <0.001)。该方法还提供了足够的劳工统计局技能,大多数样本(93.7%)通过了技能观察测试,即使参与者之前没有参加过类似的培训。此外,参与者的知识和技能得分在培训后6个月显著低于培训后立即(Z=-5.157, p <0.001;Z=-4.219, p <0.001)。结论:远程学习方式的劳工统计局培训有效地提高了被试的劳工统计局知识和技能。然而,他们的知识和技能在培训后六个月有所下降。总体而言,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之后,远程学习方法已被证明是一种有希望的替代劳工统计局培训的方法。
Basic Life Support Training: The Effectiveness and Retention of The Distance-Learning Method
Introduction: Basic Life Support (BLS) training during the COVID-19 pandemic needed to be effective as well as prevent disease transmission between trainers and participants. The distance-learning method is one of the recommended modified training methods. However, there is still limited research that evaluates the effectiveness of the distance-learning method for BLS training for laypersons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and retention of the distance-learning method for BLS training in improving the participant’s knowledge and skills. Materials and Methods: This is a non-randomized quasi-experimental study (one group pre-test and post-test design). A total of 64 TAGANA (Taruna Siaga Bencana/disaster volunteer) members of Sleman Regency who had undergone the distance learning method for BLS training were the participants of this study. A knowledge questionnaire and observation checklist were prepared and tested for context validity by an expert group. Data on the participant’s knowledge were collected before and after the training session, and data on the participant’s skills were recorded after the training session. After the training, a social media group was created to provide a periodical refresher of the BLS materials and facilitate discussions between the speakers and the study’s samples. Data on knowledge retention and skills were recorded six months post-training. Results: The distance-learning method for BLS training effectively increased the participants' knowledge of BLS, indicated by a significantly higher final knowledge score than before the training (Z=-6.904, p <0.001). The method also provided sufficient BLS skills, indicated by most of the samples (93.7%) passing the skill observation test even though no participant had attended a similar training before. Moreover, the participant’s knowledge and skills scores were significantly lower six months after the training session than immediately after training (Z=-5.157, p <0.001; Z=-4.219, p <0.001). Conclusion: The distance-learning method for BLS training effectively increased the participant’s BLS knowledge and skills. However, their knowledge and skills decreased at six months post-training. Overall, the distance-learning method has been proven as a promising alternative to BLS training during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.