Peyami Safa Gülay
{"title":"FELSEFE-EDEBİYAT SINIRINI İHLAL ETMEK: DERRIDA’NIN METAFOR FİKRİ","authors":"Peyami Safa Gülay","doi":"10.53844/flsf.990690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Derrida claimed that philosophy has traditionally positioned itself in an oppositional relationship to literature. According to this opposition, literature is evaluated in a secondary position compared to philosophy. Metaphor, as a literary movement, also retrieves its share from this secondary position. Therefore, it is understood as an external act and remains in the subsidiary status. Derrida tends to demonstrate this spesific boundary between philosophy and literature as fictional, rather than natural. Philosophy sets this limit in order to occupy a privileged position by excluding the literary movement within it. However, Derrida aims to illustrate the disruption in philosophy's attempt to occupy a privileged position, by focusing on the aspect of metaphor that causes transgression of the aforementioned boundary. Thus, according to Derrida, metaphor is understood as a founding movement that transgresses the philosophy-literature boundary and successfully binds both disciplines.","PeriodicalId":407854,"journal":{"name":"FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53844/flsf.990690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德里达声称,哲学传统上把自己定位在与文学的对立关系中。根据这种反对意见,与哲学相比,文学被置于次要地位。隐喻作为一种文学运动,也从这一次要地位中获得了自己的份额。因此,它被理解为一种外在的行为,并保持辅助的地位。德里达倾向于证明哲学和文学之间的这种特定界限是虚构的,而不是自然的。哲学设定这一界限,是为了通过排除文学运动而占据特权地位。然而,德里达的目的是说明哲学试图占据特权地位的破坏,通过关注隐喻的方面,导致上述边界的越界。因此,根据德里达的说法,隐喻被理解为一种超越哲学-文学界限的创始运动,并成功地将这两个学科结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FELSEFE-EDEBİYAT SINIRINI İHLAL ETMEK: DERRIDA’NIN METAFOR FİKRİ
Derrida claimed that philosophy has traditionally positioned itself in an oppositional relationship to literature. According to this opposition, literature is evaluated in a secondary position compared to philosophy. Metaphor, as a literary movement, also retrieves its share from this secondary position. Therefore, it is understood as an external act and remains in the subsidiary status. Derrida tends to demonstrate this spesific boundary between philosophy and literature as fictional, rather than natural. Philosophy sets this limit in order to occupy a privileged position by excluding the literary movement within it. However, Derrida aims to illustrate the disruption in philosophy's attempt to occupy a privileged position, by focusing on the aspect of metaphor that causes transgression of the aforementioned boundary. Thus, according to Derrida, metaphor is understood as a founding movement that transgresses the philosophy-literature boundary and successfully binds both disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信