“战争与淫荡”:特洛伊罗斯与克蕾西达的主题统一

E. Hart
{"title":"“战争与淫荡”:特洛伊罗斯与克蕾西达的主题统一","authors":"E. Hart","doi":"10.1353/rmr.1973.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"And war and lechery confound all!\" said Thersites, thereby stating the theme of Troilus and Cressida. It would seem inevitable that a dramatic genius with as fertile an imagination as Shakespeare's, experimenting with forms and ideas, would sooner or later ask himself the question: What would happen if one should write a play in which all values are reversed, a play in which the mirror held up to life reflects not a positive but a negative image? Regardless of whether Shakespeare ever asked himself such a question, Troilus and Cressida is such a play as the question would have invited. It is a play in which everything that was white in his other plays is confounded into black; everything that was black has become white. This does not mean that Shakespeare's values have changed; it means merely that the negative must be developed by exposure to the reversing light of irony to produce the correct and positive print. Love, in all Shakespeare's writings, reaches its highest fulfillment in marriage and procreation, with biological reproduction coming to symbolize all forms of creativity and productivity. As others have pointed out, the heavy curse of the uncreative life is projected symbolically in the childlessness of Macbeth and the sterility called by Lear upon his daughters. Shakespeare rejects both extremes of love, both celibacy and promiscuousness. The first line of the first sonnet puts aside as foolish the ideals of courtly or romantic love: \"From fairest creatures we desire increase\"; a later sonnet ( 129) rejects the way of the philanderer just as vehemently: The expense of spirit in a waste of shame / Is lust in action.\" The Aristotelian golden mean is, for Shakespeare, marriage: marriage of two people equal in their love and without those impediments which would prevent their achievement of a happy union producing healthy children. It goes without saying that a life of sexual abstention would produce no offspring, that it would provide no means by which, through the power of an all-absorbing love, the female fertilized the imagination of the man as he released in her the power to reproduce. That a life of sexual excess would likewise preclude this land of inter-impregnation is demonstrated by Troilus and Cressida. Because the idea is a negative one, the thwarting of the creative powers of love and life, the image is thrown negatively upon the screen. In the two principal female characters of Troilus, Cressida and Helen, Shakespeare illustrates the violation of the golden mean of love on the side of promiscuousness. The two women are parallel in that the vice of each is to destroy love by reducing it to sex. Love, frustrated from becoming creative","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1973-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"War and Lechery\\\": Thematic Unity of Troilus and Cressida\",\"authors\":\"E. Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rmr.1973.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"And war and lechery confound all!\\\" said Thersites, thereby stating the theme of Troilus and Cressida. It would seem inevitable that a dramatic genius with as fertile an imagination as Shakespeare's, experimenting with forms and ideas, would sooner or later ask himself the question: What would happen if one should write a play in which all values are reversed, a play in which the mirror held up to life reflects not a positive but a negative image? Regardless of whether Shakespeare ever asked himself such a question, Troilus and Cressida is such a play as the question would have invited. It is a play in which everything that was white in his other plays is confounded into black; everything that was black has become white. This does not mean that Shakespeare's values have changed; it means merely that the negative must be developed by exposure to the reversing light of irony to produce the correct and positive print. Love, in all Shakespeare's writings, reaches its highest fulfillment in marriage and procreation, with biological reproduction coming to symbolize all forms of creativity and productivity. As others have pointed out, the heavy curse of the uncreative life is projected symbolically in the childlessness of Macbeth and the sterility called by Lear upon his daughters. Shakespeare rejects both extremes of love, both celibacy and promiscuousness. The first line of the first sonnet puts aside as foolish the ideals of courtly or romantic love: \\\"From fairest creatures we desire increase\\\"; a later sonnet ( 129) rejects the way of the philanderer just as vehemently: The expense of spirit in a waste of shame / Is lust in action.\\\" The Aristotelian golden mean is, for Shakespeare, marriage: marriage of two people equal in their love and without those impediments which would prevent their achievement of a happy union producing healthy children. It goes without saying that a life of sexual abstention would produce no offspring, that it would provide no means by which, through the power of an all-absorbing love, the female fertilized the imagination of the man as he released in her the power to reproduce. That a life of sexual excess would likewise preclude this land of inter-impregnation is demonstrated by Troilus and Cressida. Because the idea is a negative one, the thwarting of the creative powers of love and life, the image is thrown negatively upon the screen. In the two principal female characters of Troilus, Cressida and Helen, Shakespeare illustrates the violation of the golden mean of love on the side of promiscuousness. The two women are parallel in that the vice of each is to destroy love by reducing it to sex. Love, frustrated from becoming creative\",\"PeriodicalId\":344945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1973-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1973.0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmr.1973.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“战争和淫荡使一切都混乱不堪!”忒尔塞斯这样说,从而道出了《特洛伊罗斯与克蕾西达》的主题。一个像莎士比亚这样有着丰富想象力的戏剧天才,在各种形式和思想上进行试验,他迟早会问自己这样一个问题:如果一个人写一部所有价值观都颠倒的戏剧,一部反映生活的镜子反映的不是积极的而是消极的形象的戏剧,会发生什么?不管莎士比亚是否问过自己这样的问题,《特洛伊罗斯与克蕾西达》就是这样一部剧,因为这个问题会引起这样的问题。在这部戏剧中,他其他戏剧中所有的白色都变成了黑色;黑色的一切都变成了白色。这并不意味着莎士比亚的价值观改变了;它仅仅意味着底片必须在反讽的反向光线下冲洗,才能产生正确的正面照片。在莎士比亚的所有作品中,爱情在婚姻和繁殖中达到了最高境界,生物繁殖成为所有形式的创造力和生产力的象征。正如其他人指出的那样,缺乏创造力的生活的沉重诅咒象征性地反映在麦克白的无子女和李尔王对他女儿的不育上。莎士比亚拒绝爱情的两个极端,独身和滥交。第一首十四行诗的第一行将宫廷或浪漫爱情的理想视为愚蠢而搁置一边:“我们希望从最美丽的生物那里得到增长”;后来的一首十四行诗(129)同样强烈地拒绝了花花公子的方式:“在羞耻的浪费中耗费精神/是行动中的欲望。”对莎士比亚来说,亚里士多德的中庸之道是婚姻:两个在爱情上平等的人的婚姻,没有阻碍他们实现幸福结合、生育健康子女的障碍。不用说,禁欲的生活不会产生后代,它不会提供任何手段,通过一种全神贯注的爱的力量,当男人在她身上释放出生育的能力时,女人使男人的想象力受精。性过剩的生活同样会阻碍这片土地的孕育这一点在特洛伊罗斯和克蕾西达身上得到了证明。因为这个想法是消极的,它阻碍了爱和生活的创造力,所以这个形象被消极地扔到屏幕上。在特洛伊罗斯的两个主要女性角色,克蕾西达和海伦,莎士比亚说明了在滥交方面违反了爱情的中庸。这两个女人的相似之处在于,她们的恶习都是通过将爱简化为性来破坏爱。爱,因失去创造力而受挫
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"War and Lechery": Thematic Unity of Troilus and Cressida
"And war and lechery confound all!" said Thersites, thereby stating the theme of Troilus and Cressida. It would seem inevitable that a dramatic genius with as fertile an imagination as Shakespeare's, experimenting with forms and ideas, would sooner or later ask himself the question: What would happen if one should write a play in which all values are reversed, a play in which the mirror held up to life reflects not a positive but a negative image? Regardless of whether Shakespeare ever asked himself such a question, Troilus and Cressida is such a play as the question would have invited. It is a play in which everything that was white in his other plays is confounded into black; everything that was black has become white. This does not mean that Shakespeare's values have changed; it means merely that the negative must be developed by exposure to the reversing light of irony to produce the correct and positive print. Love, in all Shakespeare's writings, reaches its highest fulfillment in marriage and procreation, with biological reproduction coming to symbolize all forms of creativity and productivity. As others have pointed out, the heavy curse of the uncreative life is projected symbolically in the childlessness of Macbeth and the sterility called by Lear upon his daughters. Shakespeare rejects both extremes of love, both celibacy and promiscuousness. The first line of the first sonnet puts aside as foolish the ideals of courtly or romantic love: "From fairest creatures we desire increase"; a later sonnet ( 129) rejects the way of the philanderer just as vehemently: The expense of spirit in a waste of shame / Is lust in action." The Aristotelian golden mean is, for Shakespeare, marriage: marriage of two people equal in their love and without those impediments which would prevent their achievement of a happy union producing healthy children. It goes without saying that a life of sexual abstention would produce no offspring, that it would provide no means by which, through the power of an all-absorbing love, the female fertilized the imagination of the man as he released in her the power to reproduce. That a life of sexual excess would likewise preclude this land of inter-impregnation is demonstrated by Troilus and Cressida. Because the idea is a negative one, the thwarting of the creative powers of love and life, the image is thrown negatively upon the screen. In the two principal female characters of Troilus, Cressida and Helen, Shakespeare illustrates the violation of the golden mean of love on the side of promiscuousness. The two women are parallel in that the vice of each is to destroy love by reducing it to sex. Love, frustrated from becoming creative
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信