飞行甲板自动化的人为因素问题

K. Funk, B. Lyall
{"title":"飞行甲板自动化的人为因素问题","authors":"K. Funk, B. Lyall","doi":"10.1109/DASC.1998.741562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely acknowledged that commercial transport aircraft automation has improved the economy of airliners, and that accident rates for advanced technology commercial aircraft are lower than those of comparable conventional technology aircraft. Nevertheless, criticism of the human factors of modern flight deck automation is common among pilots and other aviation professionals (e.g., Billings, 1997). Until recently, though, there was no comprehensive list of flight deck automation human factors issues, much less a comprehensive summary of evidence (data and other reasonably objective information) related to those issues. As a result, avionics designers have been somewhat in the dark about the usability of the equipment they have created to help improve the efficiency and safety of commercial air transportation. This paper summarizes a study we conducted to identify and compile evidence related to flight deck automation human factors issues. To be useful to those individuals directly involved in the development of future automation systems, the paper focuses primarily on those issues related to automation design.","PeriodicalId":335827,"journal":{"name":"17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human factors issues of flight deck automation\",\"authors\":\"K. Funk, B. Lyall\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DASC.1998.741562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely acknowledged that commercial transport aircraft automation has improved the economy of airliners, and that accident rates for advanced technology commercial aircraft are lower than those of comparable conventional technology aircraft. Nevertheless, criticism of the human factors of modern flight deck automation is common among pilots and other aviation professionals (e.g., Billings, 1997). Until recently, though, there was no comprehensive list of flight deck automation human factors issues, much less a comprehensive summary of evidence (data and other reasonably objective information) related to those issues. As a result, avionics designers have been somewhat in the dark about the usability of the equipment they have created to help improve the efficiency and safety of commercial air transportation. This paper summarizes a study we conducted to identify and compile evidence related to flight deck automation human factors issues. To be useful to those individuals directly involved in the development of future automation systems, the paper focuses primarily on those issues related to automation design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.1998.741562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.1998.741562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

人们普遍认为,商用运输机的自动化提高了客机的经济性,而且先进技术商用飞机的事故率低于同类传统技术飞机。然而,对现代驾驶舱自动化的人为因素的批评在飞行员和其他航空专业人员中很常见(例如,Billings, 1997)。然而,直到最近,还没有关于驾驶舱自动化人为因素问题的全面清单,更不用说与这些问题相关的证据(数据和其他合理客观的信息)的全面总结了。因此,航空电子设计人员对他们创造的有助于提高商业航空运输效率和安全性的设备的可用性有些一无所知。本文总结了我们进行的一项研究,以识别和汇编与飞行甲板自动化人为因素问题相关的证据。为了对那些直接参与未来自动化系统开发的个人有用,本文主要关注与自动化设计相关的那些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human factors issues of flight deck automation
It is widely acknowledged that commercial transport aircraft automation has improved the economy of airliners, and that accident rates for advanced technology commercial aircraft are lower than those of comparable conventional technology aircraft. Nevertheless, criticism of the human factors of modern flight deck automation is common among pilots and other aviation professionals (e.g., Billings, 1997). Until recently, though, there was no comprehensive list of flight deck automation human factors issues, much less a comprehensive summary of evidence (data and other reasonably objective information) related to those issues. As a result, avionics designers have been somewhat in the dark about the usability of the equipment they have created to help improve the efficiency and safety of commercial air transportation. This paper summarizes a study we conducted to identify and compile evidence related to flight deck automation human factors issues. To be useful to those individuals directly involved in the development of future automation systems, the paper focuses primarily on those issues related to automation design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信