香港SARS危机:女权主义对社会政策的挑战

L. Leung
{"title":"香港SARS危机:女权主义对社会政策的挑战","authors":"L. Leung","doi":"10.1142/S0219246209000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper concerns the risk that women faced during the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003. The concept of a \"risk society\", which is developed by Ulrich Beck, has made a major contribution to our understanding of the SARS crisis. He points out that risk is not equally distributed among all people in society, but adheres to patterns that are based on class and gender. He also suggests that the increasing trend of individualization has created a set of obligations and responsibilities to people, any individuals who failed to avoid risk are seen as personal failure and to be blamed. During the SARS crisis, women were more likely to be infected by the virus, as the primary care takers of the family, in the community, and being health care workers in hospitals. However, women were at risk not only due to their role as carers, but the dominant and authoritative discourses that undermined their claims for protection. This paper attempts to deconstruct the discourses of the roles of women in health crises, and to discuss how the discourses interplay with other social structures to construct a \"reality\", to marginalise and silent women in a crisis situation.","PeriodicalId":328832,"journal":{"name":"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE SARS CRISIS IN HONG KONG: A FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO SOCIAL POLICY\",\"authors\":\"L. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0219246209000035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper concerns the risk that women faced during the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003. The concept of a \\\"risk society\\\", which is developed by Ulrich Beck, has made a major contribution to our understanding of the SARS crisis. He points out that risk is not equally distributed among all people in society, but adheres to patterns that are based on class and gender. He also suggests that the increasing trend of individualization has created a set of obligations and responsibilities to people, any individuals who failed to avoid risk are seen as personal failure and to be blamed. During the SARS crisis, women were more likely to be infected by the virus, as the primary care takers of the family, in the community, and being health care workers in hospitals. However, women were at risk not only due to their role as carers, but the dominant and authoritative discourses that undermined their claims for protection. This paper attempts to deconstruct the discourses of the roles of women in health crises, and to discuss how the discourses interplay with other social structures to construct a \\\"reality\\\", to marginalise and silent women in a crisis situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"179 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219246209000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219246209000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文关注2003年香港爆发严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)期间妇女面临的风险。乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)提出的“风险社会”概念,对我们理解非典危机做出了重大贡献。他指出,风险并不是平均分布在社会上的所有人身上,而是遵循着基于阶级和性别的模式。他还认为,日益增长的个体化趋势给人们带来了一系列的义务和责任,任何未能避免风险的个人都被视为个人的失败,应该受到指责。在SARS危机期间,妇女作为家庭、社区的主要照顾者和医院的保健工作者,更容易被病毒感染。然而,女性面临风险不仅是因为她们作为照顾者的角色,还因为主导和权威的话语破坏了她们要求保护的要求。本文试图解构关于妇女在健康危机中的角色的话语,并讨论这些话语如何与其他社会结构相互作用,以构建一个“现实”,在危机情况下边缘化和沉默妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE SARS CRISIS IN HONG KONG: A FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO SOCIAL POLICY
This paper concerns the risk that women faced during the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003. The concept of a "risk society", which is developed by Ulrich Beck, has made a major contribution to our understanding of the SARS crisis. He points out that risk is not equally distributed among all people in society, but adheres to patterns that are based on class and gender. He also suggests that the increasing trend of individualization has created a set of obligations and responsibilities to people, any individuals who failed to avoid risk are seen as personal failure and to be blamed. During the SARS crisis, women were more likely to be infected by the virus, as the primary care takers of the family, in the community, and being health care workers in hospitals. However, women were at risk not only due to their role as carers, but the dominant and authoritative discourses that undermined their claims for protection. This paper attempts to deconstruct the discourses of the roles of women in health crises, and to discuss how the discourses interplay with other social structures to construct a "reality", to marginalise and silent women in a crisis situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信