促进非正式电子废物回收环境中更安全工作条件的干预措施的社会技术分析

Sofia L. Schlezak, Juan Lucena, Alina Handorean, Luciana Antolini, R. Neitzel, Ó. R. Baena
{"title":"促进非正式电子废物回收环境中更安全工作条件的干预措施的社会技术分析","authors":"Sofia L. Schlezak, Juan Lucena, Alina Handorean, Luciana Antolini, R. Neitzel, Ó. R. Baena","doi":"10.1109/GHTC55712.2022.9910976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informal recycling of electrical and electronic waste is a significant source of income for some families in the Global South. When workers implement unsafe practices, they are potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals that can negatively impact the environment and their health. Although this is a problem that has been studied for years, technological interventions that aim to reduce risks in informal contexts are rarely analyzed in light of social criteria. In this paper we evaluate intervention strategies through a model built on the Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (ESCD) criteria. We find that, in general the interventions lack a thorough process of workers’ participation since the early stages of design, which could inform projects, minimize harm within the communities, and promote long-term sustainability of interventions. In light of these findings, we recommend that future technological interventions implemented in informal e-waste recycling settings be designed based on the model presented.","PeriodicalId":370986,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A sociotechnical analysis of interventions to promote safer working conditions in informal e-waste recycling settings\",\"authors\":\"Sofia L. Schlezak, Juan Lucena, Alina Handorean, Luciana Antolini, R. Neitzel, Ó. R. Baena\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GHTC55712.2022.9910976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Informal recycling of electrical and electronic waste is a significant source of income for some families in the Global South. When workers implement unsafe practices, they are potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals that can negatively impact the environment and their health. Although this is a problem that has been studied for years, technological interventions that aim to reduce risks in informal contexts are rarely analyzed in light of social criteria. In this paper we evaluate intervention strategies through a model built on the Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (ESCD) criteria. We find that, in general the interventions lack a thorough process of workers’ participation since the early stages of design, which could inform projects, minimize harm within the communities, and promote long-term sustainability of interventions. In light of these findings, we recommend that future technological interventions implemented in informal e-waste recycling settings be designed based on the model presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC55712.2022.9910976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC55712.2022.9910976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

非正式的电器和电子废物回收是南半球一些家庭的重要收入来源。当工人采取不安全做法时,他们可能会接触到可能对环境和健康产生负面影响的危险化学品。虽然这是一个研究多年的问题,但旨在减少非正式环境中风险的技术干预措施很少根据社会标准进行分析。在本文中,我们通过建立在工程和可持续社区发展(ESCD)标准上的模型来评估干预策略。我们发现,从设计的早期阶段开始,干预措施总体上缺乏工人参与的彻底过程,这可以为项目提供信息,最大限度地减少社区内的伤害,并促进干预措施的长期可持续性。鉴于这些发现,我们建议未来在非正式电子废物回收环境中实施的技术干预措施应基于所提出的模型进行设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A sociotechnical analysis of interventions to promote safer working conditions in informal e-waste recycling settings
Informal recycling of electrical and electronic waste is a significant source of income for some families in the Global South. When workers implement unsafe practices, they are potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals that can negatively impact the environment and their health. Although this is a problem that has been studied for years, technological interventions that aim to reduce risks in informal contexts are rarely analyzed in light of social criteria. In this paper we evaluate intervention strategies through a model built on the Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (ESCD) criteria. We find that, in general the interventions lack a thorough process of workers’ participation since the early stages of design, which could inform projects, minimize harm within the communities, and promote long-term sustainability of interventions. In light of these findings, we recommend that future technological interventions implemented in informal e-waste recycling settings be designed based on the model presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信