传播学行为研究的证伪程序

Thomas S. Frentz
{"title":"传播学行为研究的证伪程序","authors":"Thomas S. Frentz","doi":"10.1080/10417948309372570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, it is argued that reliance upon verification procedures has inhibited theory building in communication. Four falsification procedures are advanced and exemplified through communication studies. Finally, several implications are offered for conducting future behavioral research in communication from the falsification perspective.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Falsification procedures for behavioral research in communication\",\"authors\":\"Thomas S. Frentz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417948309372570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, it is argued that reliance upon verification procedures has inhibited theory building in communication. Four falsification procedures are advanced and exemplified through communication studies. Finally, several implications are offered for conducting future behavioral research in communication from the falsification perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948309372570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948309372570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,对验证程序的依赖抑制了交流中的理论构建。通过传播学研究,提出并举例说明了四种伪造程序。最后,从造假的角度对今后的传播行为研究提出了几点启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Falsification procedures for behavioral research in communication
In this essay, it is argued that reliance upon verification procedures has inhibited theory building in communication. Four falsification procedures are advanced and exemplified through communication studies. Finally, several implications are offered for conducting future behavioral research in communication from the falsification perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信