腹膜炎预后预测方法的信息性探讨

N. V. Lebedev, V. S. Popov, A. Klimov, V. A. Ivanov, G. T. Svanadze
{"title":"腹膜炎预后预测方法的信息性探讨","authors":"N. V. Lebedev, V. S. Popov, A. Klimov, V. A. Ivanov, G. T. Svanadze","doi":"10.33920/med-15-2102-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of literature data on the most common general clinical and specific systems for predicting the outcome of peritonitis was carried out. The informativeness of the methods for predicting the outcome of peritonitis was performed according to the parameters of sensitivity and specificity (Se and Sp). The sum of the proportions of correct forecast results characterizes the accuracy of the method (Ac). We also calculated the predictive value of a positive result (PPV; hereinafter referred to as predictive value), which is the proportion (probability) of unfavorable outcomes among all patients with a high risk of death. The article also demonstrates the assessment of predictive ability using the example of four common scales for predicting the outcome of secondary peritonitis. The results of the study showed that none of the studied systems for predicting the outcome of peritonitis is universal and absolutely reliable. Despite the fact that all the studied systems (scales) are used in clinical practice, none of them can completely satisfy surgeons, primarily in the choice of access, the volume of surgery and the option for its completion.","PeriodicalId":437500,"journal":{"name":"Hirurg (Surgeon)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerning the informativeness of the methods for predicting prognosis of peritonitis\",\"authors\":\"N. V. Lebedev, V. S. Popov, A. Klimov, V. A. Ivanov, G. T. Svanadze\",\"doi\":\"10.33920/med-15-2102-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analysis of literature data on the most common general clinical and specific systems for predicting the outcome of peritonitis was carried out. The informativeness of the methods for predicting the outcome of peritonitis was performed according to the parameters of sensitivity and specificity (Se and Sp). The sum of the proportions of correct forecast results characterizes the accuracy of the method (Ac). We also calculated the predictive value of a positive result (PPV; hereinafter referred to as predictive value), which is the proportion (probability) of unfavorable outcomes among all patients with a high risk of death. The article also demonstrates the assessment of predictive ability using the example of four common scales for predicting the outcome of secondary peritonitis. The results of the study showed that none of the studied systems for predicting the outcome of peritonitis is universal and absolutely reliable. Despite the fact that all the studied systems (scales) are used in clinical practice, none of them can completely satisfy surgeons, primarily in the choice of access, the volume of surgery and the option for its completion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hirurg (Surgeon)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hirurg (Surgeon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-15-2102-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hirurg (Surgeon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-15-2102-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对预测腹膜炎预后的最常见的一般临床和特定系统的文献资料进行了分析。根据敏感性和特异性参数(Se和Sp)评价预测腹膜炎预后的方法的信息量。正确预测结果比例的总和表征了该方法的准确性(Ac)。我们还计算了阳性结果的预测值(PPV;以下简称预测值),即不良结局在所有高危死亡患者中所占的比例(概率)。本文还以预测继发性腹膜炎预后的四种常用量表为例,论证了预测能力的评估。研究结果表明,所研究的预测腹膜炎结局的系统中没有一个是普遍和绝对可靠的。尽管所有研究的系统(量表)都在临床实践中使用,但它们都不能完全满足外科医生,主要是在通道选择、手术量和完成手术的选择上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concerning the informativeness of the methods for predicting prognosis of peritonitis
The analysis of literature data on the most common general clinical and specific systems for predicting the outcome of peritonitis was carried out. The informativeness of the methods for predicting the outcome of peritonitis was performed according to the parameters of sensitivity and specificity (Se and Sp). The sum of the proportions of correct forecast results characterizes the accuracy of the method (Ac). We also calculated the predictive value of a positive result (PPV; hereinafter referred to as predictive value), which is the proportion (probability) of unfavorable outcomes among all patients with a high risk of death. The article also demonstrates the assessment of predictive ability using the example of four common scales for predicting the outcome of secondary peritonitis. The results of the study showed that none of the studied systems for predicting the outcome of peritonitis is universal and absolutely reliable. Despite the fact that all the studied systems (scales) are used in clinical practice, none of them can completely satisfy surgeons, primarily in the choice of access, the volume of surgery and the option for its completion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信