{"title":"弊大于利?监管网络内容的危险","authors":"Victoria Hewson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3850577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online communication and sharing of user generated content have become part of everyday life, but have long worried governments, which have sought to monitor and gain access for reasons of security and crime prevention. Digital platforms used to be considered socially beneficial, and legal measures were passed to facilitate the hosting of user generated content, but governments are increasingly worried about what they consider \"harmful\" content that is widely available through digital platforms. It has been claimed that democratic processes have been subverted by online disinformation and misinformation, and that children and adults are at risk of psychological harm and exploitation from offensive or inappropriate material. Measures are being pursued to counter these perceived harms, including the EU's Code of Practice on Disinformation and the UK government's forthcoming Online Safety Bill. This paper considers the need for such measures and the risks of unintended consequences.","PeriodicalId":401061,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Consumer Privacy (Sub-Topic)","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Harm Than Good? The Perils of Regulating Online Content\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Hewson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3850577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online communication and sharing of user generated content have become part of everyday life, but have long worried governments, which have sought to monitor and gain access for reasons of security and crime prevention. Digital platforms used to be considered socially beneficial, and legal measures were passed to facilitate the hosting of user generated content, but governments are increasingly worried about what they consider \\\"harmful\\\" content that is widely available through digital platforms. It has been claimed that democratic processes have been subverted by online disinformation and misinformation, and that children and adults are at risk of psychological harm and exploitation from offensive or inappropriate material. Measures are being pursued to counter these perceived harms, including the EU's Code of Practice on Disinformation and the UK government's forthcoming Online Safety Bill. This paper considers the need for such measures and the risks of unintended consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Consumer Privacy (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Consumer Privacy (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3850577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Consumer Privacy (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3850577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在线交流和分享用户生成的内容已成为日常生活的一部分,但长期以来一直令政府感到担忧。出于安全和预防犯罪的原因,政府一直试图监控和获取访问权限。数字平台过去被认为对社会有益,并且通过了法律措施来促进用户生成内容的托管,但政府越来越担心他们认为通过数字平台广泛提供的“有害”内容。有人声称,民主进程已经被网上的虚假信息和错误信息所颠覆,儿童和成人面临着心理伤害的风险,并受到攻击性或不适当材料的利用。政府正在采取措施应对这些危害,包括欧盟的《虚假信息行为准则》(Code of Practice on Disinformation)和英国政府即将出台的《在线安全法案》(Online Safety Bill)。本文考虑了这些措施的必要性和意外后果的风险。
More Harm Than Good? The Perils of Regulating Online Content
Online communication and sharing of user generated content have become part of everyday life, but have long worried governments, which have sought to monitor and gain access for reasons of security and crime prevention. Digital platforms used to be considered socially beneficial, and legal measures were passed to facilitate the hosting of user generated content, but governments are increasingly worried about what they consider "harmful" content that is widely available through digital platforms. It has been claimed that democratic processes have been subverted by online disinformation and misinformation, and that children and adults are at risk of psychological harm and exploitation from offensive or inappropriate material. Measures are being pursued to counter these perceived harms, including the EU's Code of Practice on Disinformation and the UK government's forthcoming Online Safety Bill. This paper considers the need for such measures and the risks of unintended consequences.