{"title":"方解石是一种多孔弹性颗粒介质","authors":"N. Chotiros, M. Isakson","doi":"10.1109/OCEANSSYD.2010.5603825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calcarenite is described as sand-size particles that are cemented together by carbonates, therefore it should be modeled as a poroelastic medium. Elastic and poroelastic models of calcarenite are compared. The poroelastic models include the baseline Biot model and the Biot-Stoll with contact squirt flow and viscous shear drag (BICSQS) model. Input parameters for the poroelastic models are developed. Reflection loss as a function of frequency and angle is computed. Model predictions of shallow water propagation loss over a calcarenite seabed are compared. Differences in propagation loss predictions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":129808,"journal":{"name":"OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calcarenite as a poroelastic granular medium\",\"authors\":\"N. Chotiros, M. Isakson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OCEANSSYD.2010.5603825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Calcarenite is described as sand-size particles that are cemented together by carbonates, therefore it should be modeled as a poroelastic medium. Elastic and poroelastic models of calcarenite are compared. The poroelastic models include the baseline Biot model and the Biot-Stoll with contact squirt flow and viscous shear drag (BICSQS) model. Input parameters for the poroelastic models are developed. Reflection loss as a function of frequency and angle is computed. Model predictions of shallow water propagation loss over a calcarenite seabed are compared. Differences in propagation loss predictions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSSYD.2010.5603825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANS'10 IEEE SYDNEY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSSYD.2010.5603825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calcarenite is described as sand-size particles that are cemented together by carbonates, therefore it should be modeled as a poroelastic medium. Elastic and poroelastic models of calcarenite are compared. The poroelastic models include the baseline Biot model and the Biot-Stoll with contact squirt flow and viscous shear drag (BICSQS) model. Input parameters for the poroelastic models are developed. Reflection loss as a function of frequency and angle is computed. Model predictions of shallow water propagation loss over a calcarenite seabed are compared. Differences in propagation loss predictions are discussed.