基于概率模型检验的聚类协议的比较分析

Qian Li, Péter Schaffer, Jun Pang, S. Mauw
{"title":"基于概率模型检验的聚类协议的比较分析","authors":"Qian Li, Péter Schaffer, Jun Pang, S. Mauw","doi":"10.1109/TASE.2012.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless sensor networks with hundreds of sensor nodes have emerged in recent years as important platforms for a wide spectrum of monitoring tasks ranging from environmental to military applications. In order to support scalability and increase lifetime of these networks, sensor nodes are preferably grouped into clusters. A large number of clustering protocols have been proposed in the literature with different aims, requirements and efficiency. Previous comparative studies of such protocols were usually based on simulation, which, however, only provides average case results on the limited state space explored. To mend this situation, in this paper, we evaluate and compare four state-of-the-art clustering protocols, i.e., LEACH, GENLEACH, HEED and PANEL, with full state space exploration. Within our analytical framework that consists of a network configuration and an energy consumption model, we aim at analyzing the correctness and performance of the investigated protocols. Our analysis is conducted formally through probabilistic model checking using PRISM and has its focus on the quantitative aspects of the protocols.","PeriodicalId":417979,"journal":{"name":"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Clustering Protocols with Probabilistic Model Checking\",\"authors\":\"Qian Li, Péter Schaffer, Jun Pang, S. Mauw\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TASE.2012.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wireless sensor networks with hundreds of sensor nodes have emerged in recent years as important platforms for a wide spectrum of monitoring tasks ranging from environmental to military applications. In order to support scalability and increase lifetime of these networks, sensor nodes are preferably grouped into clusters. A large number of clustering protocols have been proposed in the literature with different aims, requirements and efficiency. Previous comparative studies of such protocols were usually based on simulation, which, however, only provides average case results on the limited state space explored. To mend this situation, in this paper, we evaluate and compare four state-of-the-art clustering protocols, i.e., LEACH, GENLEACH, HEED and PANEL, with full state space exploration. Within our analytical framework that consists of a network configuration and an energy consumption model, we aim at analyzing the correctness and performance of the investigated protocols. Our analysis is conducted formally through probabilistic model checking using PRISM and has its focus on the quantitative aspects of the protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

近年来,具有数百个传感器节点的无线传感器网络已成为从环境到军事应用等广泛监测任务的重要平台。为了支持可扩展性和增加这些网络的生命周期,传感器节点最好被分组到集群中。文献中提出了大量的聚类协议,其目的、要求和效率各不相同。以往对这类协议的比较研究通常是基于仿真的,在有限的状态空间中只能提供平均情况的结果。为了改善这种情况,在本文中,我们评估和比较了四种最先进的聚类协议,即LEACH, GENLEACH, HEED和PANEL,并进行了全状态空间探索。在由网络配置和能耗模型组成的分析框架中,我们的目标是分析所研究协议的正确性和性能。我们的分析是通过使用PRISM的概率模型检查正式进行的,并侧重于协议的定量方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Clustering Protocols with Probabilistic Model Checking
Wireless sensor networks with hundreds of sensor nodes have emerged in recent years as important platforms for a wide spectrum of monitoring tasks ranging from environmental to military applications. In order to support scalability and increase lifetime of these networks, sensor nodes are preferably grouped into clusters. A large number of clustering protocols have been proposed in the literature with different aims, requirements and efficiency. Previous comparative studies of such protocols were usually based on simulation, which, however, only provides average case results on the limited state space explored. To mend this situation, in this paper, we evaluate and compare four state-of-the-art clustering protocols, i.e., LEACH, GENLEACH, HEED and PANEL, with full state space exploration. Within our analytical framework that consists of a network configuration and an energy consumption model, we aim at analyzing the correctness and performance of the investigated protocols. Our analysis is conducted formally through probabilistic model checking using PRISM and has its focus on the quantitative aspects of the protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信