职业暴露与呼吸健康:阻塞性肺病负担(BOLD)研究结果

Jate Ratanachina, Afs Amaral, S. D. Matteis, P. Cullinan, P. Burney
{"title":"职业暴露与呼吸健康:阻塞性肺病负担(BOLD)研究结果","authors":"Jate Ratanachina, Afs Amaral, S. D. Matteis, P. Cullinan, P. Burney","doi":"10.1136/THORAX-2020-BTSABSTRACTS.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objectives It has been estimated that 15% of the population burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population is attributable to occupational factors. Most of the evidence comes from studies conducted in high-income countries (HICs). Our aim was to examine the relationship between occupational exposures and respiratory health in both HICs and Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) participating in the multinational, population-based, cross-sectional BOLD study. Methods We analysed data from 28,823 adults aged ≥40 years who completed respiratory and occupational questionnaires and had acceptable and repeatable post-bronchodilator spirometry measurements. Occupational exposures comprised three categories (organic dust; inorganic dust; fume) and 11 high-risk occupations (farming; flour, feed or grain milling; cotton or jute processing; hard-rock mining; coal mining; sandblasting; working with asbestos; chemical or plastics manufacturing; foundry or steel milling; welding; and firefighting). The associations of respiratory symptoms and lung function with occupational exposures were estimated using multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounders for each BOLD site and then pooled using meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses by sex, national gross national income and smoking status were also performed. Results We found that people working in any of three categories of occupational exposures and the 11 high-risk occupations under consideration were more likely to report respiratory symptoms than those who do not work in any of those occupations. Overall, we found no consistent associations between the occupational exposure categories and high-risk occupations and measures of lung function. Nevertheless, in sensitivity analyses, men in HICs exposed to organic dusts in the workplace for at least 20 years (median) had significantly decreased FEV1/FVC (β=-0.34%; 95% CI -0.42% to -0.27%) and decreased FVC (β=-0.18L; 95% CI -0.32L to -0.04L). Men in LMICs exposed to fumes for at least 11 years had significantly decreased FEV1/FVC (β=-0.29%; 95% CI -0.41% to -0.16%). Conclusions In a large global study, we found respiratory symptoms to be associated with 11 high-risk occupations. The associations between occupational exposures and lung function varied by gross national income groups; more research is needed to understand these differences. Meanwhile, preventive measures and respiratory health surveillance should be enhanced among exposed workers.","PeriodicalId":199436,"journal":{"name":"BTS/BALR/BLF Early Career Investigator Awards","volume":"58 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T3 Occupational exposures and respiratory health: the burden of obstructive lung disease (BOLD) study results\",\"authors\":\"Jate Ratanachina, Afs Amaral, S. D. Matteis, P. Cullinan, P. Burney\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/THORAX-2020-BTSABSTRACTS.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and Objectives It has been estimated that 15% of the population burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population is attributable to occupational factors. Most of the evidence comes from studies conducted in high-income countries (HICs). Our aim was to examine the relationship between occupational exposures and respiratory health in both HICs and Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) participating in the multinational, population-based, cross-sectional BOLD study. Methods We analysed data from 28,823 adults aged ≥40 years who completed respiratory and occupational questionnaires and had acceptable and repeatable post-bronchodilator spirometry measurements. Occupational exposures comprised three categories (organic dust; inorganic dust; fume) and 11 high-risk occupations (farming; flour, feed or grain milling; cotton or jute processing; hard-rock mining; coal mining; sandblasting; working with asbestos; chemical or plastics manufacturing; foundry or steel milling; welding; and firefighting). The associations of respiratory symptoms and lung function with occupational exposures were estimated using multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounders for each BOLD site and then pooled using meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses by sex, national gross national income and smoking status were also performed. Results We found that people working in any of three categories of occupational exposures and the 11 high-risk occupations under consideration were more likely to report respiratory symptoms than those who do not work in any of those occupations. Overall, we found no consistent associations between the occupational exposure categories and high-risk occupations and measures of lung function. Nevertheless, in sensitivity analyses, men in HICs exposed to organic dusts in the workplace for at least 20 years (median) had significantly decreased FEV1/FVC (β=-0.34%; 95% CI -0.42% to -0.27%) and decreased FVC (β=-0.18L; 95% CI -0.32L to -0.04L). Men in LMICs exposed to fumes for at least 11 years had significantly decreased FEV1/FVC (β=-0.29%; 95% CI -0.41% to -0.16%). Conclusions In a large global study, we found respiratory symptoms to be associated with 11 high-risk occupations. The associations between occupational exposures and lung function varied by gross national income groups; more research is needed to understand these differences. Meanwhile, preventive measures and respiratory health surveillance should be enhanced among exposed workers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BTS/BALR/BLF Early Career Investigator Awards\",\"volume\":\"58 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BTS/BALR/BLF Early Career Investigator Awards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/THORAX-2020-BTSABSTRACTS.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BTS/BALR/BLF Early Career Investigator Awards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/THORAX-2020-BTSABSTRACTS.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据估计,慢性阻塞性肺疾病人群负担的15%可归因于职业因素。大多数证据来自在高收入国家进行的研究。我们的目的是研究高收入国家和低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)参与跨国、基于人群的横断面BOLD研究的职业暴露与呼吸健康之间的关系。方法我们分析了28,823名年龄≥40岁的成年人的数据,这些成年人完成了呼吸和职业问卷,并进行了可接受和可重复的支气管扩张剂后肺活量测定。职业接触包括三大类(有机粉尘;无机粉尘;烟雾)和11个高风险职业(农业;面粉、饲料或谷物研磨;棉花或黄麻加工;硬岩采矿;煤炭开采;喷砂;与石棉一起工作;化学或塑料制造业;铸造或炼钢;焊接;和消防)。呼吸道症状和肺功能与职业暴露的关系使用多变量回归模型进行估计,该模型对每个BOLD地点的潜在混杂因素进行调整,然后使用荟萃分析进行汇总。还进行了性别、国民总收入和吸烟状况的敏感性分析。结果我们发现,从事三种职业暴露和11种高危职业的人比不从事这些职业的人更容易报告呼吸道症状。总的来说,我们发现职业暴露类别、高危职业和肺功能测量之间没有一致的关联。然而,在敏感性分析中,在工作场所暴露于有机粉尘至少20年(中位数)的HICs男性FEV1/FVC显著降低(β=-0.34%;95% CI -0.42% ~ -0.27%)和FVC降低(β=-0.18L;95% CI为-0.32L至-0.04L)。中低收入国家暴露于烟雾至少11年的男性FEV1/FVC显著降低(β=-0.29%;95% CI -0.41%至-0.16%)。在一项大型的全球研究中,我们发现呼吸道症状与11种高危职业有关。职业暴露与肺功能之间的关系因国民总收入群体而异;需要更多的研究来理解这些差异。同时,应加强对暴露工人的预防措施和呼吸健康监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
T3 Occupational exposures and respiratory health: the burden of obstructive lung disease (BOLD) study results
Introduction and Objectives It has been estimated that 15% of the population burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population is attributable to occupational factors. Most of the evidence comes from studies conducted in high-income countries (HICs). Our aim was to examine the relationship between occupational exposures and respiratory health in both HICs and Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) participating in the multinational, population-based, cross-sectional BOLD study. Methods We analysed data from 28,823 adults aged ≥40 years who completed respiratory and occupational questionnaires and had acceptable and repeatable post-bronchodilator spirometry measurements. Occupational exposures comprised three categories (organic dust; inorganic dust; fume) and 11 high-risk occupations (farming; flour, feed or grain milling; cotton or jute processing; hard-rock mining; coal mining; sandblasting; working with asbestos; chemical or plastics manufacturing; foundry or steel milling; welding; and firefighting). The associations of respiratory symptoms and lung function with occupational exposures were estimated using multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounders for each BOLD site and then pooled using meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses by sex, national gross national income and smoking status were also performed. Results We found that people working in any of three categories of occupational exposures and the 11 high-risk occupations under consideration were more likely to report respiratory symptoms than those who do not work in any of those occupations. Overall, we found no consistent associations between the occupational exposure categories and high-risk occupations and measures of lung function. Nevertheless, in sensitivity analyses, men in HICs exposed to organic dusts in the workplace for at least 20 years (median) had significantly decreased FEV1/FVC (β=-0.34%; 95% CI -0.42% to -0.27%) and decreased FVC (β=-0.18L; 95% CI -0.32L to -0.04L). Men in LMICs exposed to fumes for at least 11 years had significantly decreased FEV1/FVC (β=-0.29%; 95% CI -0.41% to -0.16%). Conclusions In a large global study, we found respiratory symptoms to be associated with 11 high-risk occupations. The associations between occupational exposures and lung function varied by gross national income groups; more research is needed to understand these differences. Meanwhile, preventive measures and respiratory health surveillance should be enhanced among exposed workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信