研究中世纪黎凡特的“共享神圣空间”:历史学家可能遇到人类学家的地方

B. Kedar
{"title":"研究中世纪黎凡特的“共享神圣空间”:历史学家可能遇到人类学家的地方","authors":"B. Kedar","doi":"10.1080/09503110.2021.2015934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A study of medieval cases of bi- or tri-confessional worship of the same site, bolstered by insights from anthropological observations of such present-day worship, leads to the conclusion that the term “shared sacred spaces” does not do justice to the phenomena under consideration. They are more adequately described by such terms as “convergence,” “cohabitation,” “contested sacred place,” “interfaith crossover.” Future studies would benefit from the evolution of an analytical vocabulary consisting of components such as: the confessional ownership of the sacred space; the religious reasons for its veneration; the direction of interfaith crossovers; the nature of the act performed by adherents of different religions; the social standing and motivation of these adherents; the existence of a developmental trajectory.","PeriodicalId":112464,"journal":{"name":"Al-Masāq","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying the “Shared Sacred Spaces” of the Medieval Levant: Where Historians May Meet Anthropologists\",\"authors\":\"B. Kedar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09503110.2021.2015934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A study of medieval cases of bi- or tri-confessional worship of the same site, bolstered by insights from anthropological observations of such present-day worship, leads to the conclusion that the term “shared sacred spaces” does not do justice to the phenomena under consideration. They are more adequately described by such terms as “convergence,” “cohabitation,” “contested sacred place,” “interfaith crossover.” Future studies would benefit from the evolution of an analytical vocabulary consisting of components such as: the confessional ownership of the sacred space; the religious reasons for its veneration; the direction of interfaith crossovers; the nature of the act performed by adherents of different religions; the social standing and motivation of these adherents; the existence of a developmental trajectory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Masāq\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Masāq\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2021.2015934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Masāq","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110.2021.2015934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项对中世纪同一地点的双或三忏悔崇拜案例的研究,得到了对这种现代崇拜的人类学观察的支持,得出了这样的结论:“共享神圣空间”一词并不能公正地对待所考虑的现象。用“融合”、“同居”、“有争议的圣地”、“跨信仰交叉”等术语来描述它们更为恰当。未来的研究将受益于分析词汇的演变,这些词汇包括:神圣空间的忏悔所有权;崇拜它的宗教原因;跨信仰交叉的方向;不同宗教的信徒所做的行为的性质;这些信徒的社会地位和动机;发展轨迹的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying the “Shared Sacred Spaces” of the Medieval Levant: Where Historians May Meet Anthropologists
ABSTRACT A study of medieval cases of bi- or tri-confessional worship of the same site, bolstered by insights from anthropological observations of such present-day worship, leads to the conclusion that the term “shared sacred spaces” does not do justice to the phenomena under consideration. They are more adequately described by such terms as “convergence,” “cohabitation,” “contested sacred place,” “interfaith crossover.” Future studies would benefit from the evolution of an analytical vocabulary consisting of components such as: the confessional ownership of the sacred space; the religious reasons for its veneration; the direction of interfaith crossovers; the nature of the act performed by adherents of different religions; the social standing and motivation of these adherents; the existence of a developmental trajectory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信