最佳视图方法适合不同类型的对象

Júlia Kucerová, I. Varhanikova, Z. Černeková
{"title":"最佳视图方法适合不同类型的对象","authors":"Júlia Kucerová, I. Varhanikova, Z. Černeková","doi":"10.1145/2448531.2448538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present three approaches to the best view selection for 3D objects, in order to find the proper combination. The first method is based on geometry and uses the maximum amount of visible vertices. The second method uses the visual attention model and the third one calculates the amount of information in a scene after projecting the 3D scene to the 2D image using entropy. Several 3D models from Blender are used in the experiment. We compare these different approaches and explore their suitability on various objects. An online questionnaire is made to find out which of the tested images fits better to the human tastes.","PeriodicalId":235681,"journal":{"name":"Spring conference on Computer graphics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best view methods suitability for different types of objects\",\"authors\":\"Júlia Kucerová, I. Varhanikova, Z. Černeková\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2448531.2448538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present three approaches to the best view selection for 3D objects, in order to find the proper combination. The first method is based on geometry and uses the maximum amount of visible vertices. The second method uses the visual attention model and the third one calculates the amount of information in a scene after projecting the 3D scene to the 2D image using entropy. Several 3D models from Blender are used in the experiment. We compare these different approaches and explore their suitability on various objects. An online questionnaire is made to find out which of the tested images fits better to the human tastes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spring conference on Computer graphics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spring conference on Computer graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2448531.2448538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spring conference on Computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2448531.2448538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了三种方法来选择3D物体的最佳视图,以便找到合适的组合。第一种方法是基于几何,并使用最大数量的可见顶点。第二种方法使用视觉注意模型,第三种方法使用熵将3D场景投影到2D图像后计算场景中的信息量。实验中使用了Blender的几个3D模型。我们比较了这些不同的方法,并探讨了它们在不同对象上的适用性。一份在线调查问卷的目的是找出哪张图片更符合人类的口味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best view methods suitability for different types of objects
In this paper, we present three approaches to the best view selection for 3D objects, in order to find the proper combination. The first method is based on geometry and uses the maximum amount of visible vertices. The second method uses the visual attention model and the third one calculates the amount of information in a scene after projecting the 3D scene to the 2D image using entropy. Several 3D models from Blender are used in the experiment. We compare these different approaches and explore their suitability on various objects. An online questionnaire is made to find out which of the tested images fits better to the human tastes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信