常规治疗对慢性足底筋膜病有效吗?-文献综述

A. Lewis, A. Hutchison
{"title":"常规治疗对慢性足底筋膜病有效吗?-文献综述","authors":"A. Lewis, A. Hutchison","doi":"10.15761/rom.1000167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, it is not clear which intervention, physiotherapy, podiatry, pharmacological treatment, or surgery best stimulate a healing response. While there is no consensus among orthopaedic clinicians regarding the best treatment for PF, many authors recommend exhausting conventional treatment options typical of Physiotherapy and Podiatry (exercise, orthotics, manual therapy, tape, acupuncture, night splints) before proceeding to extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), injection therapy or surgery [5]. The advantages of a conventional approach include lower associated costs and less risk of complications such as infection, rupture, fat pad atrophy, osteomyelitis or nerve damage when compared to injection or surgery [6,7].","PeriodicalId":165718,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology and Orthopedic Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are conventional treatments effective for patients with chronic plantar fasciopathy? – A review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"A. Lewis, A. Hutchison\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/rom.1000167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, it is not clear which intervention, physiotherapy, podiatry, pharmacological treatment, or surgery best stimulate a healing response. While there is no consensus among orthopaedic clinicians regarding the best treatment for PF, many authors recommend exhausting conventional treatment options typical of Physiotherapy and Podiatry (exercise, orthotics, manual therapy, tape, acupuncture, night splints) before proceeding to extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), injection therapy or surgery [5]. The advantages of a conventional approach include lower associated costs and less risk of complications such as infection, rupture, fat pad atrophy, osteomyelitis or nerve damage when compared to injection or surgery [6,7].\",\"PeriodicalId\":165718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology and Orthopedic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology and Orthopedic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/rom.1000167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology and Orthopedic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/rom.1000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,尚不清楚哪种干预,物理治疗,足部治疗,药物治疗,或手术最好地刺激愈合反应。尽管骨科临床医生对PF的最佳治疗方法尚无共识,但许多作者建议,在进行体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)、注射治疗或手术之前,应尝试物理治疗和足部治疗(运动、矫形、手工治疗、胶带、针灸、夜间夹板)等典型的常规治疗方案[5]。与注射或手术相比,传统方法的优点包括较低的相关成本和较低的并发症风险,如感染、破裂、脂肪垫萎缩、骨髓炎或神经损伤[6,7]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are conventional treatments effective for patients with chronic plantar fasciopathy? – A review of the literature
Currently, it is not clear which intervention, physiotherapy, podiatry, pharmacological treatment, or surgery best stimulate a healing response. While there is no consensus among orthopaedic clinicians regarding the best treatment for PF, many authors recommend exhausting conventional treatment options typical of Physiotherapy and Podiatry (exercise, orthotics, manual therapy, tape, acupuncture, night splints) before proceeding to extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), injection therapy or surgery [5]. The advantages of a conventional approach include lower associated costs and less risk of complications such as infection, rupture, fat pad atrophy, osteomyelitis or nerve damage when compared to injection or surgery [6,7].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信