高二学生解剖学和生理学专业术语的反馈诱导学习

Pelden Nima, T. Dorji, P. Khandu, Tobgay
{"title":"高二学生解剖学和生理学专业术语的反馈诱导学习","authors":"Pelden Nima, T. Dorji, P. Khandu, Tobgay","doi":"10.17102/bjrd.rub.12.1.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback is perceived as single most influential educational factor and driver of students learning. Hence, the present study examined the effect of administering feedback on improving the acquisition of anatomy and physiology-specific terminologies among tenth grade high school students. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: a control group (N = 29), instructive feedback (IF) group (N = 29) and written feedback (WF) group (N = 29). A post-test was administered to determine if feedback had significant effect on the two treatment groups. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant difference among all the groups. Therefore, to compare the mean difference between the groups, a post hoc analysis, Dunn’s test, was performed. The result indicated significant difference between control versus (vs) IF, control vs WF and IF vs WF, respectively. Similarly, the results of feedback administration on specific anatomy and physiology-specific chapters showed that groups subjected to feedback intervention was statistically significant compared to control group. While there was no significant effect of feedback on gender in IF, we found that written feedback had significant effect on gender in WF group. Taken together, the present results suggest that administering feedback significantly enhanced learning of anatomy and physiology-specific terminologies. Accordingly, we recommend teachers to provide written feedback as it allows learners ample time for review and maximize its impact.","PeriodicalId":244206,"journal":{"name":"Bhutan Journal of Research and Development","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feedback-induced Learning of Anatomy and Physiology-specific Terminology among Tenth Grade High School Students\",\"authors\":\"Pelden Nima, T. Dorji, P. Khandu, Tobgay\",\"doi\":\"10.17102/bjrd.rub.12.1.0066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feedback is perceived as single most influential educational factor and driver of students learning. Hence, the present study examined the effect of administering feedback on improving the acquisition of anatomy and physiology-specific terminologies among tenth grade high school students. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: a control group (N = 29), instructive feedback (IF) group (N = 29) and written feedback (WF) group (N = 29). A post-test was administered to determine if feedback had significant effect on the two treatment groups. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant difference among all the groups. Therefore, to compare the mean difference between the groups, a post hoc analysis, Dunn’s test, was performed. The result indicated significant difference between control versus (vs) IF, control vs WF and IF vs WF, respectively. Similarly, the results of feedback administration on specific anatomy and physiology-specific chapters showed that groups subjected to feedback intervention was statistically significant compared to control group. While there was no significant effect of feedback on gender in IF, we found that written feedback had significant effect on gender in WF group. Taken together, the present results suggest that administering feedback significantly enhanced learning of anatomy and physiology-specific terminologies. Accordingly, we recommend teachers to provide written feedback as it allows learners ample time for review and maximize its impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bhutan Journal of Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bhutan Journal of Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.12.1.0066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bhutan Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.12.1.0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反馈被认为是唯一最具影响力的教育因素和学生学习的驱动力。因此,本研究考察了管理反馈对提高高一学生解剖学和生理学专业术语习得的影响。参与者随机分为三组:对照组(N = 29)、指导性反馈组(N = 29)和书面反馈组(N = 29)。进行后测以确定反馈是否对两个治疗组有显著影响。Kruskal-Wallis测试显示各组之间存在显著差异。因此,为了比较各组之间的平均差异,进行了事后分析,即Dunn检验。结果显示,对照组与(vs) IF、对照组与WF、IF与WF之间分别存在显著性差异。同样,对特定解剖和生理章节进行反馈干预的结果显示,与对照组相比,接受反馈干预的组具有统计学意义。在IF组中,反馈对性别没有显著影响,而在WF组中,我们发现书面反馈对性别有显著影响。综上所述,目前的结果表明,管理反馈显着增强了解剖学和生理学特定术语的学习。因此,我们建议教师提供书面反馈,因为这样可以让学习者有充足的时间进行复习,并最大限度地发挥其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feedback-induced Learning of Anatomy and Physiology-specific Terminology among Tenth Grade High School Students
Feedback is perceived as single most influential educational factor and driver of students learning. Hence, the present study examined the effect of administering feedback on improving the acquisition of anatomy and physiology-specific terminologies among tenth grade high school students. Participants were randomly divided into three groups: a control group (N = 29), instructive feedback (IF) group (N = 29) and written feedback (WF) group (N = 29). A post-test was administered to determine if feedback had significant effect on the two treatment groups. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant difference among all the groups. Therefore, to compare the mean difference between the groups, a post hoc analysis, Dunn’s test, was performed. The result indicated significant difference between control versus (vs) IF, control vs WF and IF vs WF, respectively. Similarly, the results of feedback administration on specific anatomy and physiology-specific chapters showed that groups subjected to feedback intervention was statistically significant compared to control group. While there was no significant effect of feedback on gender in IF, we found that written feedback had significant effect on gender in WF group. Taken together, the present results suggest that administering feedback significantly enhanced learning of anatomy and physiology-specific terminologies. Accordingly, we recommend teachers to provide written feedback as it allows learners ample time for review and maximize its impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信