CrowdStudy:用于网络界面众包评估的通用工具包

Michael Nebeling, Maximilian Speicher, M. Norrie
{"title":"CrowdStudy:用于网络界面众包评估的通用工具包","authors":"Michael Nebeling, Maximilian Speicher, M. Norrie","doi":"10.1145/2494603.2480303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While traditional usability testing methods can be both time consuming and expensive, tools for automated usability evaluation tend to oversimplify the problem by limiting themselves to supporting only certain evaluation criteria, settings, tasks and scenarios. We present CrowdStudy, a general web toolkit that combines support for automated usability testing with crowdsourcing to facilitate large-scale online user testing. CrowdStudy is based on existing crowdsourcing techniques for recruiting workers and guiding them through complex tasks, but implements mechanisms specifically designed for usability studies, allowing testers to control user sampling and conduct evaluations for particular contexts of use. Our toolkit provides support for context-aware data collection and analysis based on an extensible set of metrics, as well as tools for managing, reviewing and analysing any collected data. The paper demonstrates several useful features of CrowdStudy for two different scenarios, and discusses the benefits and tradeoffs of using crowdsourced evaluation.","PeriodicalId":163033,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Interactive Computing System","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CrowdStudy: general toolkit for crowdsourced evaluation of web interfaces\",\"authors\":\"Michael Nebeling, Maximilian Speicher, M. Norrie\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2494603.2480303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While traditional usability testing methods can be both time consuming and expensive, tools for automated usability evaluation tend to oversimplify the problem by limiting themselves to supporting only certain evaluation criteria, settings, tasks and scenarios. We present CrowdStudy, a general web toolkit that combines support for automated usability testing with crowdsourcing to facilitate large-scale online user testing. CrowdStudy is based on existing crowdsourcing techniques for recruiting workers and guiding them through complex tasks, but implements mechanisms specifically designed for usability studies, allowing testers to control user sampling and conduct evaluations for particular contexts of use. Our toolkit provides support for context-aware data collection and analysis based on an extensible set of metrics, as well as tools for managing, reviewing and analysing any collected data. The paper demonstrates several useful features of CrowdStudy for two different scenarios, and discusses the benefits and tradeoffs of using crowdsourced evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Interactive Computing System\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Interactive Computing System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2494603.2480303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Interactive Computing System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2494603.2480303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

虽然传统的可用性测试方法既耗时又昂贵,但自动化可用性评估工具往往过于简化了问题,因为它们将自己限制在只支持特定的评估标准、设置、任务和场景。我们介绍了CrowdStudy,这是一个通用的网络工具包,它结合了对自动化可用性测试和众包的支持,以促进大规模的在线用户测试。CrowdStudy基于现有的众包技术来招募员工并指导他们完成复杂的任务,但实现了专门为可用性研究设计的机制,允许测试人员控制用户抽样并对特定的使用环境进行评估。我们的工具包支持基于可扩展指标集的上下文感知数据收集和分析,以及用于管理、审查和分析任何收集到的数据的工具。本文在两种不同的情况下展示了CrowdStudy的几个有用的功能,并讨论了使用众包评估的好处和权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CrowdStudy: general toolkit for crowdsourced evaluation of web interfaces
While traditional usability testing methods can be both time consuming and expensive, tools for automated usability evaluation tend to oversimplify the problem by limiting themselves to supporting only certain evaluation criteria, settings, tasks and scenarios. We present CrowdStudy, a general web toolkit that combines support for automated usability testing with crowdsourcing to facilitate large-scale online user testing. CrowdStudy is based on existing crowdsourcing techniques for recruiting workers and guiding them through complex tasks, but implements mechanisms specifically designed for usability studies, allowing testers to control user sampling and conduct evaluations for particular contexts of use. Our toolkit provides support for context-aware data collection and analysis based on an extensible set of metrics, as well as tools for managing, reviewing and analysing any collected data. The paper demonstrates several useful features of CrowdStudy for two different scenarios, and discusses the benefits and tradeoffs of using crowdsourced evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信