Feridun M. Celebi, Elizabeth S. Kim, Quan Wang, Carla A. Wall, F. Shic
{"title":"一种平滑追踪校准技术","authors":"Feridun M. Celebi, Elizabeth S. Kim, Quan Wang, Carla A. Wall, F. Shic","doi":"10.1145/2578153.2583042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many different eye-tracking calibration techniques have been developed [e.g. see Talmi and Liu 1999; Zhu and Ji 2007]. A community standard is a 9-point-sparse calibration that relies on sequential presentation of known scene targets. However, fixating different points has been described as tedious, dull and tiring for the eye [Bulling, Gellersen, Pfeuffer, Turner and Vidal 2013].","PeriodicalId":142459,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A smooth pursuit calibration technique\",\"authors\":\"Feridun M. Celebi, Elizabeth S. Kim, Quan Wang, Carla A. Wall, F. Shic\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2578153.2583042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many different eye-tracking calibration techniques have been developed [e.g. see Talmi and Liu 1999; Zhu and Ji 2007]. A community standard is a 9-point-sparse calibration that relies on sequential presentation of known scene targets. However, fixating different points has been described as tedious, dull and tiring for the eye [Bulling, Gellersen, Pfeuffer, Turner and Vidal 2013].\",\"PeriodicalId\":142459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2583042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2583042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Many different eye-tracking calibration techniques have been developed [e.g. see Talmi and Liu 1999; Zhu and Ji 2007]. A community standard is a 9-point-sparse calibration that relies on sequential presentation of known scene targets. However, fixating different points has been described as tedious, dull and tiring for the eye [Bulling, Gellersen, Pfeuffer, Turner and Vidal 2013].