维特根斯坦的语言游戏概念与私人语言争论研究

R. Weerasekara
{"title":"维特根斯坦的语言游戏概念与私人语言争论研究","authors":"R. Weerasekara","doi":"10.4038/SUSLJ.V12I1.7025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intent of this paper is to examine at what Wittgenstein’s says about language as a use in the term of language games and the private language argument. The major argument of Wittgenstein on the language is the rules of the use of ordinary language is neither right nor wrong, neither true nor false, the language is merely useful for the particular applications in which they are applied . On Wittgenstein’s view, Language is defined not as a system of representation but as a system of devices for engaging in various sorts of social activity, hence ‘the meaning of the word is its use in the language’. Wittgenstein gave us considerable help in understanding what he means by ‘the meaning of the words is its use in the language’ in the term of Language Games and the Private Language Argument. There are various misunderstandings of Wittgenstein’s philosophical ideas by professionals and ordinary readers. They have stemmed largely from a failure to grasp, or come to terms with this aspect of his thought. Thus the major objective of this study is to examine comprehensively what Wittgenstein says about the concept of Language game and the private language argument. The study is based on empirical research methodology. Primary data will be collected by used empirical experiments. Secondary data will be collected by published documents. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/suslj.v12i1.7025 Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2013; V. 12 No. 1 pp 83-95","PeriodicalId":363402,"journal":{"name":"Sabaragamuwa University Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on Ludwig Wittgenstein’s concept of language games and the private language argument\",\"authors\":\"R. Weerasekara\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/SUSLJ.V12I1.7025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The intent of this paper is to examine at what Wittgenstein’s says about language as a use in the term of language games and the private language argument. The major argument of Wittgenstein on the language is the rules of the use of ordinary language is neither right nor wrong, neither true nor false, the language is merely useful for the particular applications in which they are applied . On Wittgenstein’s view, Language is defined not as a system of representation but as a system of devices for engaging in various sorts of social activity, hence ‘the meaning of the word is its use in the language’. Wittgenstein gave us considerable help in understanding what he means by ‘the meaning of the words is its use in the language’ in the term of Language Games and the Private Language Argument. There are various misunderstandings of Wittgenstein’s philosophical ideas by professionals and ordinary readers. They have stemmed largely from a failure to grasp, or come to terms with this aspect of his thought. Thus the major objective of this study is to examine comprehensively what Wittgenstein says about the concept of Language game and the private language argument. The study is based on empirical research methodology. Primary data will be collected by used empirical experiments. Secondary data will be collected by published documents. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/suslj.v12i1.7025 Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2013; V. 12 No. 1 pp 83-95\",\"PeriodicalId\":363402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sabaragamuwa University Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sabaragamuwa University Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/SUSLJ.V12I1.7025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sabaragamuwa University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SUSLJ.V12I1.7025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是考察维特根斯坦在语言游戏和私人语言争论方面对语言作为一种用途的看法。维特根斯坦关于语言的主要论点是日常语言的使用规则,既非对也非错,既非真也非假,语言只是在特定的应用中有用。在维特根斯坦看来,语言的定义不是表征系统,而是参与各种社会活动的手段系统,因此“词的意义就是它在语言中的使用”。维特根斯坦在《语言游戏》和《私人语言论证》中给了我们很大的帮助,帮助我们理解他所说的“词语的意义在于它在语言中的运用”是什么意思。专业人士和普通读者对维特根斯坦的哲学思想存在着各种各样的误解。它们在很大程度上源于未能把握或接受他思想的这一方面。因此,本研究的主要目的是全面考察维特根斯坦对语言游戏概念和私人语言论证的看法。本研究采用实证研究方法。主要数据将通过使用经验实验收集。次要数据将通过发表的文件收集。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/suslj.v12i1.7025 Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2013;第12节第1页,83-95页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study on Ludwig Wittgenstein’s concept of language games and the private language argument
The intent of this paper is to examine at what Wittgenstein’s says about language as a use in the term of language games and the private language argument. The major argument of Wittgenstein on the language is the rules of the use of ordinary language is neither right nor wrong, neither true nor false, the language is merely useful for the particular applications in which they are applied . On Wittgenstein’s view, Language is defined not as a system of representation but as a system of devices for engaging in various sorts of social activity, hence ‘the meaning of the word is its use in the language’. Wittgenstein gave us considerable help in understanding what he means by ‘the meaning of the words is its use in the language’ in the term of Language Games and the Private Language Argument. There are various misunderstandings of Wittgenstein’s philosophical ideas by professionals and ordinary readers. They have stemmed largely from a failure to grasp, or come to terms with this aspect of his thought. Thus the major objective of this study is to examine comprehensively what Wittgenstein says about the concept of Language game and the private language argument. The study is based on empirical research methodology. Primary data will be collected by used empirical experiments. Secondary data will be collected by published documents. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/suslj.v12i1.7025 Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2013; V. 12 No. 1 pp 83-95
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信