美国广播管制的起源:一个修正主义理论

Charles H. Tillinghast
{"title":"美国广播管制的起源:一个修正主义理论","authors":"Charles H. Tillinghast","doi":"10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely believed that radio regulation imposed by the 1927 Radio Act was required to control signal interference that threatened broadcasting with a tragedy of the commons: too many stations producing interfering signals. Thomas W. Hazlett (1990, 2001) disputes this view, contending that powers adequate to cope with interference were already provided by the 1912 Radio Act, but, more important, that no such government regulation was needed to eliminate signal interference, a fact well known to policymakers of the period. This article evaluates Hazlett's claims.","PeriodicalId":331997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio Studies","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origins of American Broadcast Regulation: A Revisionist Theory\",\"authors\":\"Charles H. Tillinghast\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely believed that radio regulation imposed by the 1927 Radio Act was required to control signal interference that threatened broadcasting with a tragedy of the commons: too many stations producing interfering signals. Thomas W. Hazlett (1990, 2001) disputes this view, contending that powers adequate to cope with interference were already provided by the 1912 Radio Act, but, more important, that no such government regulation was needed to eliminate signal interference, a fact well known to policymakers of the period. This article evaluates Hazlett's claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radio Studies\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radio Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人们普遍认为,1927年《无线电法案》(radio Act)实施的无线电管制是为了控制信号干扰,因为信号干扰威胁着广播,造成了“公地悲剧”:太多电台产生干扰信号。Thomas W. Hazlett(1991,2001)对这一观点提出异议,他认为1912年的《无线电法案》已经提供了足够的权力来应对干扰,但更重要的是,不需要这样的政府监管来消除信号干扰,这是当时政策制定者众所周知的事实。本文对Hazlett的观点进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Origins of American Broadcast Regulation: A Revisionist Theory
It is widely believed that radio regulation imposed by the 1927 Radio Act was required to control signal interference that threatened broadcasting with a tragedy of the commons: too many stations producing interfering signals. Thomas W. Hazlett (1990, 2001) disputes this view, contending that powers adequate to cope with interference were already provided by the 1912 Radio Act, but, more important, that no such government regulation was needed to eliminate signal interference, a fact well known to policymakers of the period. This article evaluates Hazlett's claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信