发展一个评估计算机项目可持续性的框架

Anton Lundström, D. Pargman
{"title":"发展一个评估计算机项目可持续性的框架","authors":"Anton Lundström, D. Pargman","doi":"10.1145/3080556.3080562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Toyama [19] has proposed a \"preliminary taxonomy\" for classifying computing projects as a way of separating sustainable computing efforts from unsustainable ones. In this paper we explore the feasibility of Toyama's taxonomy. We begin by describing how we revised and developed his taxonomy to make it more practically useful and then conducted a pilot study where we used the revised version to evaluate four computing projects. The pilot study was then used as a foundation for further discussing and developing the revised taxonomy into yet another, third and final version which we have chosen to call the Sustainable Computing Evaluation Framework (SCEF). While our proposed framework (SCEF) is more practically useful than Toyama's \"preliminary taxonomy\", there are still challenges that need to be addressed and we end the paper by suggesting where future efforts could be focused.","PeriodicalId":133595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Framework for Evaluating the Sustainability of Computing Projects\",\"authors\":\"Anton Lundström, D. Pargman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3080556.3080562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Toyama [19] has proposed a \\\"preliminary taxonomy\\\" for classifying computing projects as a way of separating sustainable computing efforts from unsustainable ones. In this paper we explore the feasibility of Toyama's taxonomy. We begin by describing how we revised and developed his taxonomy to make it more practically useful and then conducted a pilot study where we used the revised version to evaluate four computing projects. The pilot study was then used as a foundation for further discussing and developing the revised taxonomy into yet another, third and final version which we have chosen to call the Sustainable Computing Evaluation Framework (SCEF). While our proposed framework (SCEF) is more practically useful than Toyama's \\\"preliminary taxonomy\\\", there are still challenges that need to be addressed and we end the paper by suggesting where future efforts could be focused.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3080556.3080562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3080556.3080562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

Toyama[19]提出了一种对计算项目进行分类的“初步分类法”,将可持续的计算工作与不可持续的计算工作区分开来。本文探讨富山分类法的可行性。我们首先描述了我们如何修改和开发他的分类法,使其更实用,然后进行了一个试点研究,我们使用修订后的版本来评估四个计算项目。然后,试点研究被用作进一步讨论和发展修订后的分类法的基础,成为我们选择的第三个和最终版本,我们称之为可持续计算评估框架(SCEF)。虽然我们提出的框架(SCEF)比Toyama的“初步分类法”更实用,但仍有一些挑战需要解决,我们在论文的最后提出了未来工作的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Framework for Evaluating the Sustainability of Computing Projects
Toyama [19] has proposed a "preliminary taxonomy" for classifying computing projects as a way of separating sustainable computing efforts from unsustainable ones. In this paper we explore the feasibility of Toyama's taxonomy. We begin by describing how we revised and developed his taxonomy to make it more practically useful and then conducted a pilot study where we used the revised version to evaluate four computing projects. The pilot study was then used as a foundation for further discussing and developing the revised taxonomy into yet another, third and final version which we have chosen to call the Sustainable Computing Evaluation Framework (SCEF). While our proposed framework (SCEF) is more practically useful than Toyama's "preliminary taxonomy", there are still challenges that need to be addressed and we end the paper by suggesting where future efforts could be focused.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信