基于规则的火灾探测方法及其与感应法的准确度和精密度比较

D. Niharika, J. Mohana
{"title":"基于规则的火灾探测方法及其与感应法的准确度和精密度比较","authors":"D. Niharika, J. Mohana","doi":"10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to compare a novel rule-based technique for detecting fire to the vibe method. This method is based on image processing and computational techniques that simplify the computational process. This procedure was carried out on a sample size of twenty. The same samples were used for both the control and experimental groups, with a G power of 80%. The proposed strategy resulted in increased detection accuracy. Accuracy and precision for the rule-based technique were determined to be 99.19 and 70.62, respectively. For conventional approaches, accuracy and precision values of 86.24 and 60.19 were obtained. Additionally, it indicates a significance of 0.000 for precision and 0.015 for accuracy, both of which are less than 0.05. It may be stated that when compared to the vibe approach, the rule-based method produces greater accuracy and precision. It is useful for lexical and data mining analysis.","PeriodicalId":289224,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rule Based Method to Detect Fire and Compare the Accuracy and Precision with Vibe Method\",\"authors\":\"D. Niharika, J. Mohana\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to compare a novel rule-based technique for detecting fire to the vibe method. This method is based on image processing and computational techniques that simplify the computational process. This procedure was carried out on a sample size of twenty. The same samples were used for both the control and experimental groups, with a G power of 80%. The proposed strategy resulted in increased detection accuracy. Accuracy and precision for the rule-based technique were determined to be 99.19 and 70.62, respectively. For conventional approaches, accuracy and precision values of 86.24 and 60.19 were obtained. Additionally, it indicates a significance of 0.000 for precision and 0.015 for accuracy, both of which are less than 0.05. It may be stated that when compared to the vibe approach, the rule-based method produces greater accuracy and precision. It is useful for lexical and data mining analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBATS54253.2022.9759061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是比较一种新的基于规则的火灾探测技术与感应法。该方法基于图像处理和简化计算过程的计算技术。该程序是在20个样本量上进行的。对照组和实验组使用相同的样品,G功率为80%。所提出的策略提高了检测精度。基于规则的方法的准确度和精密度分别为99.19和70.62。常规方法的准确度和精密度分别为86.24和60.19。此外,它表明精度的显著性为0.000,准确度的显著性为0.015,两者都小于0.05。可以说,与vibe方法相比,基于规则的方法具有更高的准确性和精密度。它对词法和数据挖掘分析很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rule Based Method to Detect Fire and Compare the Accuracy and Precision with Vibe Method
The purpose of this article is to compare a novel rule-based technique for detecting fire to the vibe method. This method is based on image processing and computational techniques that simplify the computational process. This procedure was carried out on a sample size of twenty. The same samples were used for both the control and experimental groups, with a G power of 80%. The proposed strategy resulted in increased detection accuracy. Accuracy and precision for the rule-based technique were determined to be 99.19 and 70.62, respectively. For conventional approaches, accuracy and precision values of 86.24 and 60.19 were obtained. Additionally, it indicates a significance of 0.000 for precision and 0.015 for accuracy, both of which are less than 0.05. It may be stated that when compared to the vibe approach, the rule-based method produces greater accuracy and precision. It is useful for lexical and data mining analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信