Classwide复苏

Joshua P. Davis
{"title":"Classwide复苏","authors":"Joshua P. Davis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1768148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classwide recoveries can have various advantages over individual recoveries. They can, for example, allow plaintiffs to pursue litigation when individual actions would be uneconomical and they can make possible a statistical approach that is often not feasible in ordinary litigation. After noting these points, this Article explores subtler issues. In doing so, it focuses on situations in which classwide recoveries can do better than cumulative individual recoveries at imposing just the right amount of liability on defendants. The circumstances in which this benefit accrues are important: when some but not all members of a group suffered injury and identifying which members of the group were harmed is impossible or impractical. This issue has great significance. A recent controversy in class certification jurisprudence is whether plaintiffs must show harm to all or virtually all members of a proposed class to satisfy Feral Rule of Civil Procedure 23. This Article suggests a novel and counterintuitive thesis: class treatment and awarding classwide recoveries can be particularly valuable precisely when some courts have questioned the propriety of class certification.","PeriodicalId":151941,"journal":{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"233 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classwide Recoveries\",\"authors\":\"Joshua P. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1768148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classwide recoveries can have various advantages over individual recoveries. They can, for example, allow plaintiffs to pursue litigation when individual actions would be uneconomical and they can make possible a statistical approach that is often not feasible in ordinary litigation. After noting these points, this Article explores subtler issues. In doing so, it focuses on situations in which classwide recoveries can do better than cumulative individual recoveries at imposing just the right amount of liability on defendants. The circumstances in which this benefit accrues are important: when some but not all members of a group suffered injury and identifying which members of the group were harmed is impossible or impractical. This issue has great significance. A recent controversy in class certification jurisprudence is whether plaintiffs must show harm to all or virtually all members of a proposed class to satisfy Feral Rule of Civil Procedure 23. This Article suggests a novel and counterintuitive thesis: class treatment and awarding classwide recoveries can be particularly valuable precisely when some courts have questioned the propriety of class certification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of San Francisco School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of San Francisco School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1768148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of San Francisco School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1768148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类范围的恢复与单个恢复相比具有各种优势。例如,它们可以允许原告在个人行动不经济的情况下提起诉讼,它们可以使一种在普通诉讼中往往不可行的统计方法成为可能。注意到这些要点之后,本文将探讨更微妙的问题。在这样做的过程中,它侧重于在将适当数量的责任强加给被告方面,集体赔偿比累积个人赔偿做得更好的情况。产生这种利益的情况很重要:当一个群体的一些成员而不是所有成员受到伤害时,确定群体中哪些成员受到伤害是不可能或不切实际的。这个问题意义重大。在集体证明法理学中最近的一个争议是,原告是否必须证明对拟议集体的所有或几乎所有成员造成了伤害,才能满足《民事诉讼规则》第23条。这篇文章提出了一个新颖而违反直觉的论点:当一些法院质疑集体证明的适当性时,集体处理和给予集体范围的赔偿可能特别有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classwide Recoveries
Classwide recoveries can have various advantages over individual recoveries. They can, for example, allow plaintiffs to pursue litigation when individual actions would be uneconomical and they can make possible a statistical approach that is often not feasible in ordinary litigation. After noting these points, this Article explores subtler issues. In doing so, it focuses on situations in which classwide recoveries can do better than cumulative individual recoveries at imposing just the right amount of liability on defendants. The circumstances in which this benefit accrues are important: when some but not all members of a group suffered injury and identifying which members of the group were harmed is impossible or impractical. This issue has great significance. A recent controversy in class certification jurisprudence is whether plaintiffs must show harm to all or virtually all members of a proposed class to satisfy Feral Rule of Civil Procedure 23. This Article suggests a novel and counterintuitive thesis: class treatment and awarding classwide recoveries can be particularly valuable precisely when some courts have questioned the propriety of class certification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信