共同建设:当优步的研究走红时

Bjorn Hubert-Wallander, Eduardo Gomez Ruiz, Minal Jain, Laura Garcia-Barrio, S. Mitra, Molly Stevens
{"title":"共同建设:当优步的研究走红时","authors":"Bjorn Hubert-Wallander, Eduardo Gomez Ruiz, Minal Jain, Laura Garcia-Barrio, S. Mitra, Molly Stevens","doi":"10.1145/3290607.3299036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In late 2017, Uber was nearly a year into a complete redesign of its driver-facing mobile app. This case study describes the research program we executed to support the app's global beta launch, which aimed to \"Build Together\" with drivers across different geographies. With the goal of minimizing the time-space-cognitive distance between beta drivers and the product team, we deployed researchers in 7 cities for a 3-week research sprint, combining four high-touch ethnographic methods to understand drivers' reaction to the product. Unusually, we used an internal Google+ social media site to post a continual stream of raw, unsynthesized \"atomic evidence\" from research activities. The G+ unexpectedly went viral, creating extremely high engagement, impact, and stakeholder sentiment. Here we discuss the pros, cons, and impact of our approach, and also how success came from creating space for others to create, engage with, and act on raw evidence from the field.","PeriodicalId":389485,"journal":{"name":"Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Together: When Research Went Viral at Uber\",\"authors\":\"Bjorn Hubert-Wallander, Eduardo Gomez Ruiz, Minal Jain, Laura Garcia-Barrio, S. Mitra, Molly Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3290607.3299036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In late 2017, Uber was nearly a year into a complete redesign of its driver-facing mobile app. This case study describes the research program we executed to support the app's global beta launch, which aimed to \\\"Build Together\\\" with drivers across different geographies. With the goal of minimizing the time-space-cognitive distance between beta drivers and the product team, we deployed researchers in 7 cities for a 3-week research sprint, combining four high-touch ethnographic methods to understand drivers' reaction to the product. Unusually, we used an internal Google+ social media site to post a continual stream of raw, unsynthesized \\\"atomic evidence\\\" from research activities. The G+ unexpectedly went viral, creating extremely high engagement, impact, and stakeholder sentiment. Here we discuss the pros, cons, and impact of our approach, and also how success came from creating space for others to create, engage with, and act on raw evidence from the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年底,优步对其面向司机的移动应用程序进行了近一年的彻底重新设计。本案例研究描述了我们为支持该应用程序的全球测试版发布而执行的研究计划,该计划旨在与不同地区的司机“共同构建”。为了最大限度地缩短beta版驾驶员与产品团队之间的时间-空间认知距离,我们在7个城市部署了研究人员,进行了为期3周的冲刺研究,结合了四种高接触人种学方法来了解驾驶员对产品的反应。不同寻常的是,我们使用了一个内部的Google+社交媒体网站,连续发布了来自研究活动的原始的、未合成的“原子证据”。G+出人意料地走红,创造了极高的参与度、影响力和利益相关者情绪。在这里,我们将讨论我们的方法的优点、缺点和影响,以及如何为其他人创造空间,参与并根据该领域的原始证据采取行动,从而取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Together: When Research Went Viral at Uber
In late 2017, Uber was nearly a year into a complete redesign of its driver-facing mobile app. This case study describes the research program we executed to support the app's global beta launch, which aimed to "Build Together" with drivers across different geographies. With the goal of minimizing the time-space-cognitive distance between beta drivers and the product team, we deployed researchers in 7 cities for a 3-week research sprint, combining four high-touch ethnographic methods to understand drivers' reaction to the product. Unusually, we used an internal Google+ social media site to post a continual stream of raw, unsynthesized "atomic evidence" from research activities. The G+ unexpectedly went viral, creating extremely high engagement, impact, and stakeholder sentiment. Here we discuss the pros, cons, and impact of our approach, and also how success came from creating space for others to create, engage with, and act on raw evidence from the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信