成功的失败?后殖民分析及其传播

P. Sharrad
{"title":"成功的失败?后殖民分析及其传播","authors":"P. Sharrad","doi":"10.48189/nl.2020.v01i2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postcolonial theory has 'colonised' many more disciplines now than its origins in literary and political studies. This has produced challenges of application within academe and hostility from media commentary. I canvas some benefits and shortcomings of this situation and argue for a carefully nuanced articulation of discipline focus and interdisciplinarity.","PeriodicalId":205595,"journal":{"name":"New Literaria","volume":"58 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Failure of Success? Postcolonial Analysis and Its Spread\",\"authors\":\"P. Sharrad\",\"doi\":\"10.48189/nl.2020.v01i2.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Postcolonial theory has 'colonised' many more disciplines now than its origins in literary and political studies. This has produced challenges of application within academe and hostility from media commentary. I canvas some benefits and shortcomings of this situation and argue for a carefully nuanced articulation of discipline focus and interdisciplinarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Literaria\",\"volume\":\"58 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2020.v01i2.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2020.v01i2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后殖民理论现在已经“殖民”了比它的起源文学和政治研究更多的学科。这给学术界的应用带来了挑战,也招致了媒体评论的敌意。我分析了这种情况的一些好处和缺点,并主张对学科重点和跨学科性进行细致入微的阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Failure of Success? Postcolonial Analysis and Its Spread
Postcolonial theory has 'colonised' many more disciplines now than its origins in literary and political studies. This has produced challenges of application within academe and hostility from media commentary. I canvas some benefits and shortcomings of this situation and argue for a carefully nuanced articulation of discipline focus and interdisciplinarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信