怀疑主义、批判与写作艺术:对中世纪白沙派释经文本权威问题的初步思考

H. Liss
{"title":"怀疑主义、批判与写作艺术:对中世纪白沙派释经文本权威问题的初步思考","authors":"H. Liss","doi":"10.1515/9783110577686-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" ‘The glossed book’s lay-out [...]’ stems from Mary Carruthers, The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 265; ‘Glosses not only use a variety of strategies [...]’ is quoted from Suzanne Reynolds, Medieval Reading: Grammar, Rhetoric, and the Classical Text (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 7.  Cf. the definition from the Maimonides Centre’s mission statement: ‘One of the most important research objectives is to examine whether the method of enquiry implied in the term ‘scepticism’ could be regarded an anthropological constant [...] across both Eastern and Western philosophy and culture. The assumption would be that people in every culture express doubts about the claims of authorities to truth, the reliability of texts, and their social or mystical relevance, doubts about the power and presence of divinities, or about the power of reason and the controlling power of social structures and their respective consequences [...].’ (https://www.maimonides-centre.uni-hamburg. de; accessed March 2018).  A term introduced by Carruthers, Book of Memory, 243.  This paper is based on my article “‘Daneben steht immer ein kluger Kopf ’: Die Glossenformationen im Codex Wien hebr. 220,” in Diligens scrutator sacri eloquii. Beiträge zur Exegeseund Theologiegeschichte des Mittelalters. Festgabe für Rainer Berndt SJ, eds. Hanns Peter Neuheuser, Ralf M. W. Stammberger, and Matthias M. Tischler (Münster: Aschendorff, 2016): 53–85, and was reworked under the respective topic during my stay as Senior Fellow at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies—Jewish Scepticism, Universität Hamburg (October 2017–March 2018). My thanks to Jonas Leipziger who arranged, in particular, the edition of the gloss material in this paper, Bettina Burghardt who translated parts of this paper from German into English. Thanks also to all the staff mem-","PeriodicalId":359593,"journal":{"name":"YEARBOOK OF THE MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scepticism, Critique, and the Art of Writing: Preliminary Considerations on the Question of Textual Authority in Medieval Peshaṭ Exegesis\",\"authors\":\"H. Liss\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110577686-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" ‘The glossed book’s lay-out [...]’ stems from Mary Carruthers, The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 265; ‘Glosses not only use a variety of strategies [...]’ is quoted from Suzanne Reynolds, Medieval Reading: Grammar, Rhetoric, and the Classical Text (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 7.  Cf. the definition from the Maimonides Centre’s mission statement: ‘One of the most important research objectives is to examine whether the method of enquiry implied in the term ‘scepticism’ could be regarded an anthropological constant [...] across both Eastern and Western philosophy and culture. The assumption would be that people in every culture express doubts about the claims of authorities to truth, the reliability of texts, and their social or mystical relevance, doubts about the power and presence of divinities, or about the power of reason and the controlling power of social structures and their respective consequences [...].’ (https://www.maimonides-centre.uni-hamburg. de; accessed March 2018).  A term introduced by Carruthers, Book of Memory, 243.  This paper is based on my article “‘Daneben steht immer ein kluger Kopf ’: Die Glossenformationen im Codex Wien hebr. 220,” in Diligens scrutator sacri eloquii. Beiträge zur Exegeseund Theologiegeschichte des Mittelalters. Festgabe für Rainer Berndt SJ, eds. Hanns Peter Neuheuser, Ralf M. W. Stammberger, and Matthias M. Tischler (Münster: Aschendorff, 2016): 53–85, and was reworked under the respective topic during my stay as Senior Fellow at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies—Jewish Scepticism, Universität Hamburg (October 2017–March 2018). My thanks to Jonas Leipziger who arranged, in particular, the edition of the gloss material in this paper, Bettina Burghardt who translated parts of this paper from German into English. Thanks also to all the staff mem-\",\"PeriodicalId\":359593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"YEARBOOK OF THE MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"YEARBOOK OF THE MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110577686-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YEARBOOK OF THE MAIMONIDES CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110577686-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“这本书的版式……出自玛丽·卡拉瑟斯的《记忆之书:中世纪文化中的记忆研究》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2008年),265页;“眼镜不仅使用各种各样的策略……引用自苏珊娜·雷诺兹的《中世纪阅读:语法、修辞和古典文本》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,1996),第7页。参考迈蒙尼德中心使命宣言的定义:“最重要的研究目标之一是检验‘怀疑主义’一词所隐含的探究方法是否可以被视为人类学常数……跨越东西方哲学和文化。假设是,每一种文化中的人们都对权威对真理的主张、文本的可靠性及其社会或神秘的相关性表示怀疑,对神的力量和存在,或对理性的力量和社会结构的控制力及其各自的后果表示怀疑[…]”(https://www.maimonides-centre.uni-hamburg。德;2018年3月访问)。《记忆之书》,243页,卡拉瑟斯介绍的一个术语。本文基于我的文章“Daneben steht immer ein kluger Kopf”:Die Glossenformationen im Codex Wien hebr。[译]在勤奋的审查者牺牲雄辩。Beiträge zur Exegeseund Theologiegeschichte des Mittelalters。Festgabe f r Rainer Berndt SJ,编。hans Peter Neuheuser, Ralf M. W. Stammberger和Matthias M. Tischler (mnster: Aschendorff, 2016): 53-85,并在我担任汉堡迈蒙尼德高级研究中心犹太怀疑主义高级研究员期间(2017年10月至2018年3月)根据各自的主题进行了重新制作。我要感谢Jonas Leipziger,他特别安排了本文中注释材料的版本,Bettina Burghardt将本文的部分内容从德语翻译成英语。也感谢所有的员工
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scepticism, Critique, and the Art of Writing: Preliminary Considerations on the Question of Textual Authority in Medieval Peshaṭ Exegesis
 ‘The glossed book’s lay-out [...]’ stems from Mary Carruthers, The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 265; ‘Glosses not only use a variety of strategies [...]’ is quoted from Suzanne Reynolds, Medieval Reading: Grammar, Rhetoric, and the Classical Text (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 7.  Cf. the definition from the Maimonides Centre’s mission statement: ‘One of the most important research objectives is to examine whether the method of enquiry implied in the term ‘scepticism’ could be regarded an anthropological constant [...] across both Eastern and Western philosophy and culture. The assumption would be that people in every culture express doubts about the claims of authorities to truth, the reliability of texts, and their social or mystical relevance, doubts about the power and presence of divinities, or about the power of reason and the controlling power of social structures and their respective consequences [...].’ (https://www.maimonides-centre.uni-hamburg. de; accessed March 2018).  A term introduced by Carruthers, Book of Memory, 243.  This paper is based on my article “‘Daneben steht immer ein kluger Kopf ’: Die Glossenformationen im Codex Wien hebr. 220,” in Diligens scrutator sacri eloquii. Beiträge zur Exegeseund Theologiegeschichte des Mittelalters. Festgabe für Rainer Berndt SJ, eds. Hanns Peter Neuheuser, Ralf M. W. Stammberger, and Matthias M. Tischler (Münster: Aschendorff, 2016): 53–85, and was reworked under the respective topic during my stay as Senior Fellow at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies—Jewish Scepticism, Universität Hamburg (October 2017–March 2018). My thanks to Jonas Leipziger who arranged, in particular, the edition of the gloss material in this paper, Bettina Burghardt who translated parts of this paper from German into English. Thanks also to all the staff mem-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信