伊斯兰教法审查和伊斯兰教法审计:伊斯兰银行的伊斯兰教法合规工具

M. R. Yasoa', Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, W. Endut
{"title":"伊斯兰教法审查和伊斯兰教法审计:伊斯兰银行的伊斯兰教法合规工具","authors":"M. R. Yasoa', Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, W. Endut","doi":"10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shariah review and Shariah audit serve as a second and third line of defense in Islamic banks. This study intends to analyse the differences between these two Shariah organs based on roles, guidelines and methodology, scope of duties, technology, independence, and reporting structure as well as officers’ qualifications. A qualitative approach is used by employing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) practitioners. Data gathered from interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Findings reveal that a clear function of Shariah review and Shariah audit is pertinent to effectively mitigate risks. This scenario could eventually provide a stimulus to improve governance and market confidence.\n \nKeywords: Shariah compliance, Shariah review, Shariah audit, qualitative method\neISSN 2514-7528 ©2022. The authors. Published for AMER and cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under the responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407","PeriodicalId":196464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shariah Review and Shariah Audit: Shariah compliance tools in Islamic banks\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Yasoa', Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, W. Endut\",\"doi\":\"10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shariah review and Shariah audit serve as a second and third line of defense in Islamic banks. This study intends to analyse the differences between these two Shariah organs based on roles, guidelines and methodology, scope of duties, technology, independence, and reporting structure as well as officers’ qualifications. A qualitative approach is used by employing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) practitioners. Data gathered from interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Findings reveal that a clear function of Shariah review and Shariah audit is pertinent to effectively mitigate risks. This scenario could eventually provide a stimulus to improve governance and market confidence.\\n \\nKeywords: Shariah compliance, Shariah review, Shariah audit, qualitative method\\neISSN 2514-7528 ©2022. The authors. Published for AMER and cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under the responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.\\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407\",\"PeriodicalId\":196464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰教法审查和伊斯兰教法审计是伊斯兰银行的第二道和第三道防线。本研究旨在分析这两个伊斯兰教机构在作用、准则和方法、职责范围、技术、独立性和报告结构以及官员资格方面的差异。定性的方法是采用半结构化的访谈九(9)从业人员。从访谈中收集的数据已使用Atlas.ti进行转录和分析。调查结果表明,伊斯兰教法审查和伊斯兰教法审计的明确功能与有效减轻风险有关。这种情况最终可能会刺激治理和市场信心的改善。关键词:伊斯兰教法合规,伊斯兰教法审查,伊斯兰教法审计,定性方法issn 2514-7528©2022。作者。英国e-国际出版社出版。这是一篇基于CC BY-NC-ND许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)的开放获取文章。由马来西亚环境行为研究人员协会(AMER)和马来西亚玛拉理工大学建筑环境学院环境行为研究中心(cE-Bs)负责的同行评审。DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shariah Review and Shariah Audit: Shariah compliance tools in Islamic banks
Shariah review and Shariah audit serve as a second and third line of defense in Islamic banks. This study intends to analyse the differences between these two Shariah organs based on roles, guidelines and methodology, scope of duties, technology, independence, and reporting structure as well as officers’ qualifications. A qualitative approach is used by employing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) practitioners. Data gathered from interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Findings reveal that a clear function of Shariah review and Shariah audit is pertinent to effectively mitigate risks. This scenario could eventually provide a stimulus to improve governance and market confidence.   Keywords: Shariah compliance, Shariah review, Shariah audit, qualitative method eISSN 2514-7528 ©2022. The authors. Published for AMER and cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under the responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信