M. R. Yasoa', Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, W. Endut
{"title":"伊斯兰教法审查和伊斯兰教法审计:伊斯兰银行的伊斯兰教法合规工具","authors":"M. R. Yasoa', Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, W. Endut","doi":"10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shariah review and Shariah audit serve as a second and third line of defense in Islamic banks. This study intends to analyse the differences between these two Shariah organs based on roles, guidelines and methodology, scope of duties, technology, independence, and reporting structure as well as officers’ qualifications. A qualitative approach is used by employing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) practitioners. Data gathered from interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Findings reveal that a clear function of Shariah review and Shariah audit is pertinent to effectively mitigate risks. This scenario could eventually provide a stimulus to improve governance and market confidence.\n \nKeywords: Shariah compliance, Shariah review, Shariah audit, qualitative method\neISSN 2514-7528 ©2022. The authors. Published for AMER and cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under the responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407","PeriodicalId":196464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shariah Review and Shariah Audit: Shariah compliance tools in Islamic banks\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Yasoa', Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, W. Endut\",\"doi\":\"10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shariah review and Shariah audit serve as a second and third line of defense in Islamic banks. This study intends to analyse the differences between these two Shariah organs based on roles, guidelines and methodology, scope of duties, technology, independence, and reporting structure as well as officers’ qualifications. A qualitative approach is used by employing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) practitioners. Data gathered from interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Findings reveal that a clear function of Shariah review and Shariah audit is pertinent to effectively mitigate risks. This scenario could eventually provide a stimulus to improve governance and market confidence.\\n \\nKeywords: Shariah compliance, Shariah review, Shariah audit, qualitative method\\neISSN 2514-7528 ©2022. The authors. Published for AMER and cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under the responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.\\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407\",\"PeriodicalId\":196464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shariah Review and Shariah Audit: Shariah compliance tools in Islamic banks
Shariah review and Shariah audit serve as a second and third line of defense in Islamic banks. This study intends to analyse the differences between these two Shariah organs based on roles, guidelines and methodology, scope of duties, technology, independence, and reporting structure as well as officers’ qualifications. A qualitative approach is used by employing semi-structured interviews with nine (9) practitioners. Data gathered from interviews have been transcripted and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Findings reveal that a clear function of Shariah review and Shariah audit is pertinent to effectively mitigate risks. This scenario could eventually provide a stimulus to improve governance and market confidence.
Keywords: Shariah compliance, Shariah review, Shariah audit, qualitative method
eISSN 2514-7528 ©2022. The authors. Published for AMER and cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under the responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), College of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v7i21.407