卫生习惯和暴露于潜在的危害在伊巴丹大都会,尼日利亚手动粪便污泥疏散

Idris Oyewole Olaoye, Mumuni Adejumo, Mynepalli K. C. Sridhar
{"title":"卫生习惯和暴露于潜在的危害在伊巴丹大都会,尼日利亚手动粪便污泥疏散","authors":"Idris Oyewole Olaoye, Mumuni Adejumo, Mynepalli K. C. Sridhar","doi":"10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed faecal sludge management methods, hygiene practices and potential health hazards among manual faecal sludge evacuators within Ibadan metropolis. A cross-sectional study was conducted among sixty (60) consented manual faecal sludge evacuators using a validated questionnaire and in-depth interview guide. Hands swab samples were also collected for microbial load count. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-test at p=0.05. Respondents’ mean age was 48.2±13.3 years, 75.0% had at least primary education, 18.3% had spent more than 19 years on the job. Average monthly income was 22,546.80±3,341.90 NGN (1US$=NGN 416). Only 18.3% reported that they use PPE during emptying while 53.3% reported that they usually do hand washing with water and soap. In-depth interview of participants emphasised that the protective foot wear becomes completely soaked and making movement difficult and slow during the emptying operations. Major hazards reported by the manual evacuators were odour (41.7%), gas fumes/aerosols (18.3%) and dust (6.6%). Salmonella, Shigella and E. coli were isolated from the hand wash water samples from the manual evacuators. Eschericia coli count (cfu/mL) was significantly higher among evacuators without PPE during evacuation (4.1±2.6)×103) compared to their counterpart with PPE during evacuation (1.4±0.8)×103). Feacal sludge management by the manual evacuators was unwholesome while utilization of PPE was low among manual faecal sludge evacuators. Salmonella/shigella and E. coli was higher among evacuators that did not use PPE. Regular use of personal protective equipment and compliance with hygiene standards relating to the work should be enforced among manual fecal sludge evacuators.","PeriodicalId":394579,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hygiene practices and exposure to potential hazards among manual faecal sludge evacuators in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Idris Oyewole Olaoye, Mumuni Adejumo, Mynepalli K. C. Sridhar\",\"doi\":\"10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study assessed faecal sludge management methods, hygiene practices and potential health hazards among manual faecal sludge evacuators within Ibadan metropolis. A cross-sectional study was conducted among sixty (60) consented manual faecal sludge evacuators using a validated questionnaire and in-depth interview guide. Hands swab samples were also collected for microbial load count. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-test at p=0.05. Respondents’ mean age was 48.2±13.3 years, 75.0% had at least primary education, 18.3% had spent more than 19 years on the job. Average monthly income was 22,546.80±3,341.90 NGN (1US$=NGN 416). Only 18.3% reported that they use PPE during emptying while 53.3% reported that they usually do hand washing with water and soap. In-depth interview of participants emphasised that the protective foot wear becomes completely soaked and making movement difficult and slow during the emptying operations. Major hazards reported by the manual evacuators were odour (41.7%), gas fumes/aerosols (18.3%) and dust (6.6%). Salmonella, Shigella and E. coli were isolated from the hand wash water samples from the manual evacuators. Eschericia coli count (cfu/mL) was significantly higher among evacuators without PPE during evacuation (4.1±2.6)×103) compared to their counterpart with PPE during evacuation (1.4±0.8)×103). Feacal sludge management by the manual evacuators was unwholesome while utilization of PPE was low among manual faecal sludge evacuators. Salmonella/shigella and E. coli was higher among evacuators that did not use PPE. Regular use of personal protective equipment and compliance with hygiene standards relating to the work should be enforced among manual fecal sludge evacuators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":394579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2023.5.2.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究评估了伊巴丹市人工粪便污泥清除者的粪便污泥管理方法、卫生习惯和潜在健康危害。横断面研究在60(60)同意手动粪便污泥清除器中进行,使用有效的问卷调查和深度访谈指南。采集手拭子样本进行微生物负荷计数。定量资料采用描述性统计和t检验,p=0.05。受访者的平均年龄为48.2±13.3岁,75.0%的人受过小学以上教育,18.3%的人在职时间超过19年。平均月收入为22,546.80±3,341.90 NGN(1美元=NGN 416)。只有18.3%的人报告说他们在倒空时使用个人防护装备,而53.3%的人报告说他们通常用水和肥皂洗手。对参与者的深度访谈强调,在排空过程中,保护脚的磨损变得完全湿透,使行动困难和缓慢。手动疏散人员报告的主要危害是气味(41.7%)、气体烟雾/气溶胶(18.3%)和灰尘(6.6%)。从手动疏散人员的洗手水中分离出沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌和大肠杆菌。在疏散期间,没有PPE的疏散人员的大肠杆菌计数(cfu/mL)(4.1±2.6)×103)明显高于有PPE的疏散人员(1.4±0.8)×103)。人工排粪器对粪泥的管理不卫生,个人防护装备的利用率较低。沙门氏菌/志贺氏菌和大肠杆菌在未使用个人防护装备的疏散人员中较高。必须定期使用个人防护装备,并遵守与工作有关的卫生标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hygiene practices and exposure to potential hazards among manual faecal sludge evacuators in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria
The study assessed faecal sludge management methods, hygiene practices and potential health hazards among manual faecal sludge evacuators within Ibadan metropolis. A cross-sectional study was conducted among sixty (60) consented manual faecal sludge evacuators using a validated questionnaire and in-depth interview guide. Hands swab samples were also collected for microbial load count. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-test at p=0.05. Respondents’ mean age was 48.2±13.3 years, 75.0% had at least primary education, 18.3% had spent more than 19 years on the job. Average monthly income was 22,546.80±3,341.90 NGN (1US$=NGN 416). Only 18.3% reported that they use PPE during emptying while 53.3% reported that they usually do hand washing with water and soap. In-depth interview of participants emphasised that the protective foot wear becomes completely soaked and making movement difficult and slow during the emptying operations. Major hazards reported by the manual evacuators were odour (41.7%), gas fumes/aerosols (18.3%) and dust (6.6%). Salmonella, Shigella and E. coli were isolated from the hand wash water samples from the manual evacuators. Eschericia coli count (cfu/mL) was significantly higher among evacuators without PPE during evacuation (4.1±2.6)×103) compared to their counterpart with PPE during evacuation (1.4±0.8)×103). Feacal sludge management by the manual evacuators was unwholesome while utilization of PPE was low among manual faecal sludge evacuators. Salmonella/shigella and E. coli was higher among evacuators that did not use PPE. Regular use of personal protective equipment and compliance with hygiene standards relating to the work should be enforced among manual fecal sludge evacuators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信