本地可测试代码需要冗余的测试人员

Eli Ben-Sasson, V. Guruswami, T. Kaufman, M. Sudan, M. Viderman
{"title":"本地可测试代码需要冗余的测试人员","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, V. Guruswami, T. Kaufman, M. Sudan, M. Viderman","doi":"10.1137/090779875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locally testable codes (LTCs) are error-correcting codes for which membership, in the code, of a given word can be tested by examining it in very few locations. Most known constructions of locally testable codes are linear codes, and give error-correcting codes whose duals have (superlinearly) {\\em many} small weight codewords. Examining this feature appears to be one of the promising approaches to proving limitation results for (i.e., upper bounds on the rate of) LTCs. Unfortunately till now it was not even known if LTCs need to be non-trivially redundant, i.e., need to have {\\em one} linear dependency among the low-weight codewords in its dual. In this paper we give the first lower bound of this form, by showing that every positive rate constant query strong LTC must have linearly many redundant low-weight codewords in its dual. We actually prove the stronger claim that the {\\em actual test itself} must use a linear number of redundant dual codewords (beyond the minimum number of basis elements required to characterize the code); in other words, non-redundant (in fact, low redundancy) local testing is impossible.","PeriodicalId":158572,"journal":{"name":"2009 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locally Testable Codes Require Redundant Testers\",\"authors\":\"Eli Ben-Sasson, V. Guruswami, T. Kaufman, M. Sudan, M. Viderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/090779875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Locally testable codes (LTCs) are error-correcting codes for which membership, in the code, of a given word can be tested by examining it in very few locations. Most known constructions of locally testable codes are linear codes, and give error-correcting codes whose duals have (superlinearly) {\\\\em many} small weight codewords. Examining this feature appears to be one of the promising approaches to proving limitation results for (i.e., upper bounds on the rate of) LTCs. Unfortunately till now it was not even known if LTCs need to be non-trivially redundant, i.e., need to have {\\\\em one} linear dependency among the low-weight codewords in its dual. In this paper we give the first lower bound of this form, by showing that every positive rate constant query strong LTC must have linearly many redundant low-weight codewords in its dual. We actually prove the stronger claim that the {\\\\em actual test itself} must use a linear number of redundant dual codewords (beyond the minimum number of basis elements required to characterize the code); in other words, non-redundant (in fact, low redundancy) local testing is impossible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/090779875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/090779875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

局部可测试代码(ltc)是一种纠错代码,可以通过在很少的位置检查给定单词来测试其在代码中的隶属性。大多数已知的局部可测试码的结构是线性码,并给出其对偶具有(超线性){\em许多}小权重码字的纠错码。检查这个特征似乎是证明ltc的限制结果(即ltc率的上界)的有希望的方法之一。不幸的是,到目前为止,人们甚至不知道ltc是否需要非平凡冗余,即需要在其对偶中的低权重码字之间具有{\em}线性依赖关系。本文通过证明每一个正速率常数查询强LTC在其对偶中必须有线性多冗余低权码字,给出了这种形式的第一下界。我们实际上证明了{\em实际测试本身}必须使用线性数量的冗余对偶码字(超过表征代码所需的最小基元数量);换句话说,非冗余(实际上是低冗余)本地测试是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Locally Testable Codes Require Redundant Testers
Locally testable codes (LTCs) are error-correcting codes for which membership, in the code, of a given word can be tested by examining it in very few locations. Most known constructions of locally testable codes are linear codes, and give error-correcting codes whose duals have (superlinearly) {\em many} small weight codewords. Examining this feature appears to be one of the promising approaches to proving limitation results for (i.e., upper bounds on the rate of) LTCs. Unfortunately till now it was not even known if LTCs need to be non-trivially redundant, i.e., need to have {\em one} linear dependency among the low-weight codewords in its dual. In this paper we give the first lower bound of this form, by showing that every positive rate constant query strong LTC must have linearly many redundant low-weight codewords in its dual. We actually prove the stronger claim that the {\em actual test itself} must use a linear number of redundant dual codewords (beyond the minimum number of basis elements required to characterize the code); in other words, non-redundant (in fact, low redundancy) local testing is impossible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信