简化还是帮助?:阅读障碍患者的文本简化策略

Luz Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, Stefan Bott, Horacio Saggion
{"title":"简化还是帮助?:阅读障碍患者的文本简化策略","authors":"Luz Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, Stefan Bott, Horacio Saggion","doi":"10.1145/2461121.2461126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a user study for two different automatic strategies that simplify text content for people with dyslexia. The strategies considered are the standard one (replacing a complex word with the most simpler synonym) and a new one that presents several synonyms for a complex word if the user requests them. We compare texts transformed by both strategies with the original text and to a gold standard manually built. The study was undertook by 96 participants, 47 with dyslexia plus a control group of 49 people without dyslexia. To show device independence, for the new strategy we used three different reading devices. Overall, participants with dyslexia found texts presented with the new strategy significantly more readable and comprehensible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest user study of its kind.","PeriodicalId":339122,"journal":{"name":"International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"123","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplify or help?: text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia\",\"authors\":\"Luz Rello, R. Baeza-Yates, Stefan Bott, Horacio Saggion\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2461121.2461126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a user study for two different automatic strategies that simplify text content for people with dyslexia. The strategies considered are the standard one (replacing a complex word with the most simpler synonym) and a new one that presents several synonyms for a complex word if the user requests them. We compare texts transformed by both strategies with the original text and to a gold standard manually built. The study was undertook by 96 participants, 47 with dyslexia plus a control group of 49 people without dyslexia. To show device independence, for the new strategy we used three different reading devices. Overall, participants with dyslexia found texts presented with the new strategy significantly more readable and comprehensible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest user study of its kind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"123\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2461121.2461126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

摘要

我们提出了一个用户研究两种不同的自动策略,简化文本内容的人有阅读障碍。所考虑的策略有标准策略(用最简单的同义词替换复杂单词)和新策略(如果用户请求,则为复杂单词提供多个同义词)。我们将通过这两种策略转换的文本与原始文本和手动构建的黄金标准进行比较。这项研究由96名参与者参与,其中47名患有阅读障碍,49名没有阅读障碍的人作为对照组。为了显示设备独立性,我们在新策略中使用了三种不同的阅读设备。总体而言,患有阅读障碍的参与者发现,采用新策略呈现的文本明显更具可读性和可理解性。据我们所知,这是同类研究中规模最大的用户研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplify or help?: text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia
We present a user study for two different automatic strategies that simplify text content for people with dyslexia. The strategies considered are the standard one (replacing a complex word with the most simpler synonym) and a new one that presents several synonyms for a complex word if the user requests them. We compare texts transformed by both strategies with the original text and to a gold standard manually built. The study was undertook by 96 participants, 47 with dyslexia plus a control group of 49 people without dyslexia. To show device independence, for the new strategy we used three different reading devices. Overall, participants with dyslexia found texts presented with the new strategy significantly more readable and comprehensible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest user study of its kind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信