社论:在2014年6月,都灵(意大利)的Kettil Bruun Society研讨会上讨论利益冲突

A. Allamani, Franca Beccaria
{"title":"社论:在2014年6月,都灵(意大利)的Kettil Bruun Society研讨会上讨论利益冲突","authors":"A. Allamani, Franca Beccaria","doi":"10.7895/IJADR.V5I1.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Allamani, A., & Beccaria, F. (2016). Editorial: Discussing conflicts of interest during a Kettil Bruun Society symposium, June 2014, Turin (Italy).  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (1), 1-3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i1.226 Human beings have always sought after truth and made efforts to define and measure objects and events outside and inside themselves. In the last four centuries, since the time of Galileo, scholars came to agree more and more on a scientific method that could be shared in order to obtain replicable results that could become a common good for humanity. The results of a study can in fact lead to technological applications in various sectors of human life, like education, commerce, industry, and health. The search for scientific truth and its relationship with the economy has always had a complicated life: first, because in any given moment there will be different ideas about truth, and second, because researchers need both the means and the time to conduct their work. This is why a researcher must either support him- or herself and/or be financially supported by someone that may have different expectations about the research results. Thus, this involves the integrity of both the individual researcher and his/her referral network—the \"scientific community\"—that can call into question their ethical sphere by a potentially problematic relationship with truth, economy, and utility.","PeriodicalId":162336,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Discussing conflicts of interest during a Kettil Bruun Society symposium, June 2014, Turin (Italy)\",\"authors\":\"A. Allamani, Franca Beccaria\",\"doi\":\"10.7895/IJADR.V5I1.226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Allamani, A., & Beccaria, F. (2016). Editorial: Discussing conflicts of interest during a Kettil Bruun Society symposium, June 2014, Turin (Italy).  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (1), 1-3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i1.226 Human beings have always sought after truth and made efforts to define and measure objects and events outside and inside themselves. In the last four centuries, since the time of Galileo, scholars came to agree more and more on a scientific method that could be shared in order to obtain replicable results that could become a common good for humanity. The results of a study can in fact lead to technological applications in various sectors of human life, like education, commerce, industry, and health. The search for scientific truth and its relationship with the economy has always had a complicated life: first, because in any given moment there will be different ideas about truth, and second, because researchers need both the means and the time to conduct their work. This is why a researcher must either support him- or herself and/or be financially supported by someone that may have different expectations about the research results. Thus, this involves the integrity of both the individual researcher and his/her referral network—the \\\"scientific community\\\"—that can call into question their ethical sphere by a potentially problematic relationship with truth, economy, and utility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V5I1.226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V5I1.226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Allamani, A., & Beccaria, F.(2016)。社论:在2014年6月,都灵(意大利)的Kettil Bruun社会研讨会上讨论利益冲突。《国际酒精和药物研究杂志》,5(1),1-3。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i1.226人类一直在追求真理,并努力定义和衡量自身内外的物体和事件。在过去的四个世纪里,自伽利略时代以来,学者们越来越认同一种可以共享的科学方法,以获得可复制的结果,从而成为人类的共同利益。事实上,一项研究的结果可以导致技术应用于人类生活的各个部门,如教育、商业、工业和卫生。对科学真理及其与经济关系的探索一直是一个复杂的过程:首先,因为在任何给定的时刻都会有关于真理的不同观点,其次,因为研究人员既需要手段也需要时间来开展他们的工作。这就是为什么研究人员必须支持他或她自己和/或在经济上支持可能对研究结果有不同期望的人。因此,这涉及到研究者个人和他/她的推荐网络(“科学界”)的完整性,这可能会因为与真理、经济和效用的潜在问题关系而对他们的伦理领域提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial: Discussing conflicts of interest during a Kettil Bruun Society symposium, June 2014, Turin (Italy)
Allamani, A., & Beccaria, F. (2016). Editorial: Discussing conflicts of interest during a Kettil Bruun Society symposium, June 2014, Turin (Italy).  The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 5 (1), 1-3. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v5i1.226 Human beings have always sought after truth and made efforts to define and measure objects and events outside and inside themselves. In the last four centuries, since the time of Galileo, scholars came to agree more and more on a scientific method that could be shared in order to obtain replicable results that could become a common good for humanity. The results of a study can in fact lead to technological applications in various sectors of human life, like education, commerce, industry, and health. The search for scientific truth and its relationship with the economy has always had a complicated life: first, because in any given moment there will be different ideas about truth, and second, because researchers need both the means and the time to conduct their work. This is why a researcher must either support him- or herself and/or be financially supported by someone that may have different expectations about the research results. Thus, this involves the integrity of both the individual researcher and his/her referral network—the "scientific community"—that can call into question their ethical sphere by a potentially problematic relationship with truth, economy, and utility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信