竞争对手关系的混合链路预测

J. Pujara
{"title":"竞争对手关系的混合链路预测","authors":"J. Pujara","doi":"10.1145/3220547.3220559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competitor relationships are integral to many important financial applications. Example use cases include understanding regulatory impacts, investing in new business areas, and building economic models. Competitor relationships can be defined based on several aspects, including valuations and asset returns, industrial processes, or offerings of products and services. Determining these relationships is often challenging due to the diverse and complex interactions between companies which must be mined from vast datasets with varying degrees of credibility. In this paper, we approach this problem by constructing a hybrid knowledge graph capturing financial relationships and applying a link prediction model to identify missing competitor relationships. Knowledge graphs are a popular knowledge representation choice for capturing entities and the relationships between them. Knowledge graph construction typically uses only a single type of input data, such as relationships mined from text using information extraction techniques or curated relationships from relational databases. In contrast, for the FEIII Challenge, we are provided with several sources of relationships from different types of input, including expert judgments, mined relationships, and statistical features. Our approach creates a hybrid knowledge graph that includes relationships derived from three very different types of data in a single knowledge graph. We construct a hybrid knowledge graph using data provided for the FEIII Challenge and one additional source, the webpages of companies included in the challenge. The first data source we use are expert judgments curated by the Thomson Reuters Data Fusion (TRDF) platform. The second data source we are provided in the challenge are relationships extracted from text found in SEC filings. Finally, we introduce a third set of statistical signals, derived primarily from collecting webpages of the companies in the","PeriodicalId":161670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Data Science for Macro-Modeling with Financial and Economic Datasets","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Link Prediction for Competitor Relationships\",\"authors\":\"J. Pujara\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3220547.3220559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Competitor relationships are integral to many important financial applications. Example use cases include understanding regulatory impacts, investing in new business areas, and building economic models. Competitor relationships can be defined based on several aspects, including valuations and asset returns, industrial processes, or offerings of products and services. Determining these relationships is often challenging due to the diverse and complex interactions between companies which must be mined from vast datasets with varying degrees of credibility. In this paper, we approach this problem by constructing a hybrid knowledge graph capturing financial relationships and applying a link prediction model to identify missing competitor relationships. Knowledge graphs are a popular knowledge representation choice for capturing entities and the relationships between them. Knowledge graph construction typically uses only a single type of input data, such as relationships mined from text using information extraction techniques or curated relationships from relational databases. In contrast, for the FEIII Challenge, we are provided with several sources of relationships from different types of input, including expert judgments, mined relationships, and statistical features. Our approach creates a hybrid knowledge graph that includes relationships derived from three very different types of data in a single knowledge graph. We construct a hybrid knowledge graph using data provided for the FEIII Challenge and one additional source, the webpages of companies included in the challenge. The first data source we use are expert judgments curated by the Thomson Reuters Data Fusion (TRDF) platform. The second data source we are provided in the challenge are relationships extracted from text found in SEC filings. Finally, we introduce a third set of statistical signals, derived primarily from collecting webpages of the companies in the\",\"PeriodicalId\":161670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Data Science for Macro-Modeling with Financial and Economic Datasets\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Data Science for Macro-Modeling with Financial and Economic Datasets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3220547.3220559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Data Science for Macro-Modeling with Financial and Economic Datasets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3220547.3220559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

竞争对手关系是许多重要金融应用不可或缺的一部分。示例用例包括理解监管影响、投资新的业务领域以及构建经济模型。竞争者关系可以基于几个方面来定义,包括估值和资产回报、工业流程或产品和服务的提供。确定这些关系通常具有挑战性,因为公司之间的相互作用多样而复杂,必须从具有不同程度可信度的大量数据集中挖掘。在本文中,我们通过构建捕获财务关系的混合知识图和应用链接预测模型来识别缺失的竞争对手关系来解决这个问题。知识图是一种流行的知识表示选择,用于捕获实体及其之间的关系。知识图构造通常只使用单一类型的输入数据,例如使用信息提取技术从文本中挖掘的关系,或从关系数据库中策划的关系。相比之下,对于FEIII挑战,我们从不同类型的输入中提供了几个关系来源,包括专家判断,挖掘关系和统计特征。我们的方法创建了一个混合知识图,其中包括在单个知识图中从三种非常不同类型的数据派生的关系。我们使用为FEIII挑战赛提供的数据和一个额外的来源(挑战赛中包括的公司的网页)构建了一个混合知识图。我们使用的第一个数据来源是由汤森路透数据融合(TRDF)平台策划的专家判断。挑战中提供的第二个数据源是从SEC文件中找到的文本中提取的关系。最后,我们引入了第三组统计信号,主要来自于收集中国公司的网页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid Link Prediction for Competitor Relationships
Competitor relationships are integral to many important financial applications. Example use cases include understanding regulatory impacts, investing in new business areas, and building economic models. Competitor relationships can be defined based on several aspects, including valuations and asset returns, industrial processes, or offerings of products and services. Determining these relationships is often challenging due to the diverse and complex interactions between companies which must be mined from vast datasets with varying degrees of credibility. In this paper, we approach this problem by constructing a hybrid knowledge graph capturing financial relationships and applying a link prediction model to identify missing competitor relationships. Knowledge graphs are a popular knowledge representation choice for capturing entities and the relationships between them. Knowledge graph construction typically uses only a single type of input data, such as relationships mined from text using information extraction techniques or curated relationships from relational databases. In contrast, for the FEIII Challenge, we are provided with several sources of relationships from different types of input, including expert judgments, mined relationships, and statistical features. Our approach creates a hybrid knowledge graph that includes relationships derived from three very different types of data in a single knowledge graph. We construct a hybrid knowledge graph using data provided for the FEIII Challenge and one additional source, the webpages of companies included in the challenge. The first data source we use are expert judgments curated by the Thomson Reuters Data Fusion (TRDF) platform. The second data source we are provided in the challenge are relationships extracted from text found in SEC filings. Finally, we introduce a third set of statistical signals, derived primarily from collecting webpages of the companies in the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信