基于中心性度量的真实网络图连通支配集

N. Meghanathan, Atiqur Rahman, Mahzabin Akhter
{"title":"基于中心性度量的真实网络图连通支配集","authors":"N. Meghanathan, Atiqur Rahman, Mahzabin Akhter","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8188-8.CH001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors investigate the use of centrality metrics as node weights to determine connected dominating sets (CDS) for a suite of 60 real-world network graphs of diverse degree distribution. They employ centrality metrics that are neighborhood-based (degree centrality [DEG] and eigenvector centrality [EVC]), shortest path-based (betweenness centrality [BWC] and closeness centrality [CLC]) as well as the local clustering coefficient complement-based degree centrality metric (LCC'DC), which is a hybrid of the neighborhood and shortest path-based categories. The authors target for minimum CDS node size (number of nodes constituting the CDS). Though both the BWC and CLC are shortest path-based centrality metrics, they observe the BWC-based CDSs to be of the smallest node size for about 60% of the real-world networks and the CLC-based CDSs to be of the largest node size for more than 40% of the real-world networks. The authors observe the computationally light LCC'DC-based CDS node size to be the same as the computationally heavy BWC-based CDS node size for about 50% of the real-world networks.","PeriodicalId":149489,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Innovations and Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Telecommunications and Networking","volume":"415 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centrality Metrics-Based Connected Dominating Sets for Real-World Network Graphs\",\"authors\":\"N. Meghanathan, Atiqur Rahman, Mahzabin Akhter\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-5225-8188-8.CH001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors investigate the use of centrality metrics as node weights to determine connected dominating sets (CDS) for a suite of 60 real-world network graphs of diverse degree distribution. They employ centrality metrics that are neighborhood-based (degree centrality [DEG] and eigenvector centrality [EVC]), shortest path-based (betweenness centrality [BWC] and closeness centrality [CLC]) as well as the local clustering coefficient complement-based degree centrality metric (LCC'DC), which is a hybrid of the neighborhood and shortest path-based categories. The authors target for minimum CDS node size (number of nodes constituting the CDS). Though both the BWC and CLC are shortest path-based centrality metrics, they observe the BWC-based CDSs to be of the smallest node size for about 60% of the real-world networks and the CLC-based CDSs to be of the largest node size for more than 40% of the real-world networks. The authors observe the computationally light LCC'DC-based CDS node size to be the same as the computationally heavy BWC-based CDS node size for about 50% of the real-world networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Innovations and Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Telecommunications and Networking\",\"volume\":\"415 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Innovations and Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Telecommunications and Networking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8188-8.CH001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Innovations and Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Telecommunications and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8188-8.CH001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者研究了使用中心性度量作为节点权重来确定60个不同程度分布的真实网络图的连接支配集(CDS)。他们采用了基于邻域(度中心性[DEG]和特征向量中心性[EVC])、基于最短路径(中间性中心性[BWC]和接近性中心性[CLC])以及基于局部聚类系数互补的度中心性度量(LCC'DC)的中心性度量,它是基于邻域和基于最短路径类别的混合。作者的目标是最小CDS节点大小(构成CDS的节点数量)。尽管BWC和CLC都是基于最短路径的中心性指标,但他们观察到,在大约60%的真实网络中,基于BWC的cds具有最小的节点大小,而在超过40%的真实网络中,基于CLC的cds具有最大的节点大小。作者观察到,在50%的真实网络中,基于LCC' dc的计算轻量级CDS节点大小与基于bwc的计算重型CDS节点大小相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Centrality Metrics-Based Connected Dominating Sets for Real-World Network Graphs
The authors investigate the use of centrality metrics as node weights to determine connected dominating sets (CDS) for a suite of 60 real-world network graphs of diverse degree distribution. They employ centrality metrics that are neighborhood-based (degree centrality [DEG] and eigenvector centrality [EVC]), shortest path-based (betweenness centrality [BWC] and closeness centrality [CLC]) as well as the local clustering coefficient complement-based degree centrality metric (LCC'DC), which is a hybrid of the neighborhood and shortest path-based categories. The authors target for minimum CDS node size (number of nodes constituting the CDS). Though both the BWC and CLC are shortest path-based centrality metrics, they observe the BWC-based CDSs to be of the smallest node size for about 60% of the real-world networks and the CLC-based CDSs to be of the largest node size for more than 40% of the real-world networks. The authors observe the computationally light LCC'DC-based CDS node size to be the same as the computationally heavy BWC-based CDS node size for about 50% of the real-world networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信