{"title":"放射免疫治疗(RIT)和造血干细胞移植(HSCT)在b细胞Non-HodgkinÃⅱÂÂs淋巴瘤(NHL)中的应用:一个社区癌症中心10年的经验","authors":"Nibal Saad, K. Kolizeras, S. Szpunar, A. Al-Katib","doi":"10.4172/2155-9619.1000331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Yttrium (Y90) Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and Iodine (131I) tositumomab (Bexxar) were approved by the \n FDA, the improved response of B-cell NHL to this novel RIT makes it a promising alternative to more aggressive \n treatment like HSCT. In this study, we describe the experience of a single community-based cancer with RIT and \n HSCT in patients with B-cell NHL in terms of response, survival and toxicity. Retrospectively, we reviewed 75 \n patients with B cell NHL who were treated with either RIT (N=50) or HSCT (N=25) between 2003 and 2013. Choice \n of treatment modality, i.e. RIT vs. HSCT was based on discretion of treating Oncologist taking into consideration \n patient’s age, performance status, comorbidity and preferences. RIT-treated patients were older. HSCT was more \n likely to be used in aggressive lymphoma and as a consolidation of primary therapy. RIT was used mainly in indolent \n lymphoma and as salvage treatment. Overall response rates were better in HSCT-treated patients (100% vs. 76%). \n Median overall survival was higher in HSCT-treated patients (221 vs. 79.4 months). Similar results were obtained \n when we compared OS in patients younger than 60 years (221 vs. 79.4 months) and in patients with aggressive \n lymphoma (221 vs. 59.7 months). PFS was not met in HSCT, while it was 16.2 months in RIT. Myelodysplastic \n syndrome (MDS) occurred in both groups (12% HSCT vs. 2% RIT). Thrombocytopenia was more prevalent with RIT. \n All other toxicities were significantly more common with HSCT. This study shows that, in clinical practice, younger \n patients with aggressive B-cell NHL and without significant comorbidity are more likely to be offered HSCT. On the \n other hand, RIT was offered to older patients with indolent histology. Our results show that RIT is a reasonable \n alternative salvage treatment modality for B-cell NHL patients who are not candidates for HSCT.","PeriodicalId":302578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","volume":"555 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) and Hematopoietic Stem CellTransplantation (HSCT) in B-cell Non-HodgkinâÂÂs Lymphoma (NHL): 10 YearExperience of a Single Community Cancer Center\",\"authors\":\"Nibal Saad, K. Kolizeras, S. Szpunar, A. Al-Katib\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9619.1000331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After Yttrium (Y90) Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and Iodine (131I) tositumomab (Bexxar) were approved by the \\n FDA, the improved response of B-cell NHL to this novel RIT makes it a promising alternative to more aggressive \\n treatment like HSCT. In this study, we describe the experience of a single community-based cancer with RIT and \\n HSCT in patients with B-cell NHL in terms of response, survival and toxicity. Retrospectively, we reviewed 75 \\n patients with B cell NHL who were treated with either RIT (N=50) or HSCT (N=25) between 2003 and 2013. Choice \\n of treatment modality, i.e. RIT vs. HSCT was based on discretion of treating Oncologist taking into consideration \\n patient’s age, performance status, comorbidity and preferences. RIT-treated patients were older. HSCT was more \\n likely to be used in aggressive lymphoma and as a consolidation of primary therapy. RIT was used mainly in indolent \\n lymphoma and as salvage treatment. Overall response rates were better in HSCT-treated patients (100% vs. 76%). \\n Median overall survival was higher in HSCT-treated patients (221 vs. 79.4 months). Similar results were obtained \\n when we compared OS in patients younger than 60 years (221 vs. 79.4 months) and in patients with aggressive \\n lymphoma (221 vs. 59.7 months). PFS was not met in HSCT, while it was 16.2 months in RIT. Myelodysplastic \\n syndrome (MDS) occurred in both groups (12% HSCT vs. 2% RIT). Thrombocytopenia was more prevalent with RIT. \\n All other toxicities were significantly more common with HSCT. This study shows that, in clinical practice, younger \\n patients with aggressive B-cell NHL and without significant comorbidity are more likely to be offered HSCT. On the \\n other hand, RIT was offered to older patients with indolent histology. Our results show that RIT is a reasonable \\n alternative salvage treatment modality for B-cell NHL patients who are not candidates for HSCT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"volume\":\"555 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在Y90 ibrumomab tixetan (Zevalin)和碘(131I) tositumumab (Bexxar)获得FDA批准后,这种新型RIT对b细胞NHL的改善反应使其成为像HSCT这样更积极治疗的有希望的替代方案。在这项研究中,我们描述了一个基于社区的b细胞NHL患者的RIT和HSCT的治疗经验,包括反应、生存和毒性。回顾性地,我们回顾了2003年至2013年间接受RIT (N=50)或HSCT (N=25)治疗的75例B细胞NHL患者。治疗方式的选择,即RIT和HSCT是基于治疗肿瘤学家考虑患者的年龄、身体状况、合并症和偏好的自由裁量权。接受rit治疗的患者年龄较大。HSCT更有可能用于侵袭性淋巴瘤,并作为主要治疗的巩固。RIT主要用于惰性淋巴瘤和抢救治疗。hsct治疗患者的总有效率更好(100% vs. 76%)。接受hsct治疗的患者中位总生存期更高(221个月对79.4个月)。当我们比较60岁以下患者(221对79.4个月)和侵袭性淋巴瘤患者(221对59.7个月)的OS时,也得到了类似的结果。HSCT未达到PFS,而RIT为16.2个月。两组均发生骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS) (HSCT组12% vs RIT组2%)。血小板减少症在RIT患者中更为普遍。所有其他毒性在HSCT中更为常见。这项研究表明,在临床实践中,年轻的侵袭性b细胞NHL患者和没有明显合并症的患者更有可能接受HSCT。另一方面,RIT被提供给有惰性组织学的老年患者。我们的研究结果表明,对于不适合移植的b细胞NHL患者来说,RIT是一种合理的救助性治疗方式。
Utilization of Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) and Hematopoietic Stem CellTransplantation (HSCT) in B-cell Non-HodgkinâÂÂs Lymphoma (NHL): 10 YearExperience of a Single Community Cancer Center
After Yttrium (Y90) Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and Iodine (131I) tositumomab (Bexxar) were approved by the
FDA, the improved response of B-cell NHL to this novel RIT makes it a promising alternative to more aggressive
treatment like HSCT. In this study, we describe the experience of a single community-based cancer with RIT and
HSCT in patients with B-cell NHL in terms of response, survival and toxicity. Retrospectively, we reviewed 75
patients with B cell NHL who were treated with either RIT (N=50) or HSCT (N=25) between 2003 and 2013. Choice
of treatment modality, i.e. RIT vs. HSCT was based on discretion of treating Oncologist taking into consideration
patient’s age, performance status, comorbidity and preferences. RIT-treated patients were older. HSCT was more
likely to be used in aggressive lymphoma and as a consolidation of primary therapy. RIT was used mainly in indolent
lymphoma and as salvage treatment. Overall response rates were better in HSCT-treated patients (100% vs. 76%).
Median overall survival was higher in HSCT-treated patients (221 vs. 79.4 months). Similar results were obtained
when we compared OS in patients younger than 60 years (221 vs. 79.4 months) and in patients with aggressive
lymphoma (221 vs. 59.7 months). PFS was not met in HSCT, while it was 16.2 months in RIT. Myelodysplastic
syndrome (MDS) occurred in both groups (12% HSCT vs. 2% RIT). Thrombocytopenia was more prevalent with RIT.
All other toxicities were significantly more common with HSCT. This study shows that, in clinical practice, younger
patients with aggressive B-cell NHL and without significant comorbidity are more likely to be offered HSCT. On the
other hand, RIT was offered to older patients with indolent histology. Our results show that RIT is a reasonable
alternative salvage treatment modality for B-cell NHL patients who are not candidates for HSCT.