通过引入法律顾问专业制度来解除律师垄断

D. Riabov
{"title":"通过引入法律顾问专业制度来解除律师垄断","authors":"D. Riabov","doi":"10.15804/rop2021309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th e article studies the legal nature of the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly in Ukraine. Th e author notes the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly in Ukraine had to take four steps. However, at the last stage of the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly, the legislator amended the procedural codes regulating the course of civil, commercial, and administrative proceedings. With these changes, the legislator expanded the concept “self-representation” by substituting the concept of “representation”. In addition, the legislator brought in a draft to revoke the lawyer’s monopoly which was approved by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Th e scientist states that the relevant strategy of abolishing the lawyer’s monopoly is not a positive phenomenon. Th e introduction of court representation of citizens, business entities, state bodies, central and local authorities by a professional institute of advocacy is an upside in reforming the Ukrainian legal system. However, according to the author, the profession of a lawyer is primarily aimed at providing defense in criminal proceedings or when bringing to administrative responsibility or considering a case of an administrative off ense. At the same time, the scientist marks that the reversion to the previous wording of Article 131-2 of the Constitution of Ukraine is inadmissible since the provision of legal services in Ukraine should be carried out professionally. Aft er analyzing the legislation of the Republic of Poland, the author has concluded that lawyers and legal advisers, who carry out practical legal activities on a professional basis and permits, provide the public with legal aid. However, the only diff erence between a lawyer and a legal adviser in the Republic of Poland is that the latter cannot provide legal assistance in 1 Postgraduate Student at the Department of Commercial and Administrative Law, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University, riabov.d@donnu.edu.ua, ORCID: orcid.org/00000003-3864-4859.","PeriodicalId":300317,"journal":{"name":"Reality of Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On revocation of the lawyer’s monopoly through introducing the professional institution of legal advisers\",\"authors\":\"D. Riabov\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/rop2021309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Th e article studies the legal nature of the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly in Ukraine. Th e author notes the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly in Ukraine had to take four steps. However, at the last stage of the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly, the legislator amended the procedural codes regulating the course of civil, commercial, and administrative proceedings. With these changes, the legislator expanded the concept “self-representation” by substituting the concept of “representation”. In addition, the legislator brought in a draft to revoke the lawyer’s monopoly which was approved by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Th e scientist states that the relevant strategy of abolishing the lawyer’s monopoly is not a positive phenomenon. Th e introduction of court representation of citizens, business entities, state bodies, central and local authorities by a professional institute of advocacy is an upside in reforming the Ukrainian legal system. However, according to the author, the profession of a lawyer is primarily aimed at providing defense in criminal proceedings or when bringing to administrative responsibility or considering a case of an administrative off ense. At the same time, the scientist marks that the reversion to the previous wording of Article 131-2 of the Constitution of Ukraine is inadmissible since the provision of legal services in Ukraine should be carried out professionally. Aft er analyzing the legislation of the Republic of Poland, the author has concluded that lawyers and legal advisers, who carry out practical legal activities on a professional basis and permits, provide the public with legal aid. However, the only diff erence between a lawyer and a legal adviser in the Republic of Poland is that the latter cannot provide legal assistance in 1 Postgraduate Student at the Department of Commercial and Administrative Law, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University, riabov.d@donnu.edu.ua, ORCID: orcid.org/00000003-3864-4859.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reality of Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reality of Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2021309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reality of Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2021309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对乌克兰引入律师垄断的法律性质进行了研究。作者指出,在乌克兰引入律师垄断必须采取四个步骤。然而,在引入律师垄断的最后阶段,立法者修改了规范民事、商事和行政诉讼过程的程序法典。随着这些变化,立法者通过替换“代表”的概念来扩展“自我代表”的概念。此外,立法者还提出了一项撤销律师垄断的草案,该草案已获得乌克兰宪法法院的批准。科学家认为,废除律师垄断的相关策略不是一种积极的现象。乌克兰法律体系改革的一个好处是,由专业的辩护机构引入公民、商业实体、国家机构、中央和地方当局的法庭代表。然而,据提交人说,律师职业的主要目的是在刑事诉讼中或在提起行政责任或审议行政诉讼案件时提供辩护。同时,该科学家指出,乌克兰宪法第131-2条以前的措辞是不可接受的,因为在乌克兰提供法律服务应该是专业的。在分析了波兰共和国的立法之后,作者得出结论,律师和法律顾问在专业的基础上和许可下进行实际的法律活动,向公众提供法律援助。然而,在波兰共和国,律师和法律顾问之间的唯一区别是,后者不能提供法律援助1研究生在商业和行政法系,Vasyl Stus顿涅茨克国立大学,riabov.d@donnu.edu.ua, ORCID: orcid.org/00000003-3864-4859。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On revocation of the lawyer’s monopoly through introducing the professional institution of legal advisers
Th e article studies the legal nature of the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly in Ukraine. Th e author notes the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly in Ukraine had to take four steps. However, at the last stage of the introduction of the lawyer’s monopoly, the legislator amended the procedural codes regulating the course of civil, commercial, and administrative proceedings. With these changes, the legislator expanded the concept “self-representation” by substituting the concept of “representation”. In addition, the legislator brought in a draft to revoke the lawyer’s monopoly which was approved by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. Th e scientist states that the relevant strategy of abolishing the lawyer’s monopoly is not a positive phenomenon. Th e introduction of court representation of citizens, business entities, state bodies, central and local authorities by a professional institute of advocacy is an upside in reforming the Ukrainian legal system. However, according to the author, the profession of a lawyer is primarily aimed at providing defense in criminal proceedings or when bringing to administrative responsibility or considering a case of an administrative off ense. At the same time, the scientist marks that the reversion to the previous wording of Article 131-2 of the Constitution of Ukraine is inadmissible since the provision of legal services in Ukraine should be carried out professionally. Aft er analyzing the legislation of the Republic of Poland, the author has concluded that lawyers and legal advisers, who carry out practical legal activities on a professional basis and permits, provide the public with legal aid. However, the only diff erence between a lawyer and a legal adviser in the Republic of Poland is that the latter cannot provide legal assistance in 1 Postgraduate Student at the Department of Commercial and Administrative Law, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University, riabov.d@donnu.edu.ua, ORCID: orcid.org/00000003-3864-4859.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信