未成年人过度监禁的评估:来自少年司法和犯罪预防法案的证据

Julian Scott, G. Osho
{"title":"未成年人过度监禁的评估:来自少年司法和犯罪预防法案的证据","authors":"Julian Scott, G. Osho","doi":"10.5296/JSR.V6I1.6328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) has made some states’ reexamine their policies to reduce the number of minorities that are processed into the criminal justice system. “In 1998, Congress amended the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act by requiring that states receiving funding from Title II Part B Formula Grants program to address the issue of disproportionate minority confinement”(Rodney and Tachia, 2004.) Has the amending of Title II part B brought a trend to reduce the number of disproportionate minorities confined to secure facilities? Have other factors involved with the arrest, processing, and confinement of minorities contradict the role in which Title II Part B was intended.","PeriodicalId":239220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociological Research","volume":"434 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Disproportionate Minority Confinement: Evidence from Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act\",\"authors\":\"Julian Scott, G. Osho\",\"doi\":\"10.5296/JSR.V6I1.6328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) has made some states’ reexamine their policies to reduce the number of minorities that are processed into the criminal justice system. “In 1998, Congress amended the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act by requiring that states receiving funding from Title II Part B Formula Grants program to address the issue of disproportionate minority confinement”(Rodney and Tachia, 2004.) Has the amending of Title II part B brought a trend to reduce the number of disproportionate minorities confined to secure facilities? Have other factors involved with the arrest, processing, and confinement of minorities contradict the role in which Title II Part B was intended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sociological Research\",\"volume\":\"434 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sociological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5296/JSR.V6I1.6328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/JSR.V6I1.6328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不成比例的少数族裔监禁(DMC)使一些州重新审视其政策,以减少被刑事司法系统处理的少数族裔人数。“1998年,国会修改了《青少年司法和犯罪预防法案》,要求从第二章B部分公式拨款项目中获得资金的州解决不成比例的少数族裔监禁问题”(罗德尼和塔奇亚,2004年)。第二章B部分的修订是否带来了一种趋势,减少了被限制在安全设施中的不成比例的少数群体的人数?是否有其他与逮捕、处理和监禁少数群体有关的因素与第二章B部分所打算发挥的作用相矛盾?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of Disproportionate Minority Confinement: Evidence from Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) has made some states’ reexamine their policies to reduce the number of minorities that are processed into the criminal justice system. “In 1998, Congress amended the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act by requiring that states receiving funding from Title II Part B Formula Grants program to address the issue of disproportionate minority confinement”(Rodney and Tachia, 2004.) Has the amending of Title II part B brought a trend to reduce the number of disproportionate minorities confined to secure facilities? Have other factors involved with the arrest, processing, and confinement of minorities contradict the role in which Title II Part B was intended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信