{"title":"[用0.5%、0.75、1.0%的丙罗卡因静脉局部麻醉手臂和足部]。","authors":"T Prien, C Goeters","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication are competing principles in IVRA. To evaluate the optimal prilocaine concentration with injection of 40 ml, 300 patients were randomly allocated to receive either a 0.5 (PRI 0.5), 0.75 (PRI 0.5) or a 1.0 (PRI 1.0) per cent solution. Using PRI 0.5, fifteen patients required supplementary fentanyl, with PRI 0.75 one, and with PRI 1.0 two (p less than or equal to 0.05). General anaesthesia proved necessary in three patients of the PRI 0.5 and 0.75 groups, respectively, and in one patient of the PRI 1.0 group (NS). With PRI 1.0 seven patients had subjective signs of intoxication upon tourniquet release, with PRI 0.75 none, and with PRI 0.5 one (p less than or equal to 0.05). Objective symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity were not observed. The incidence of tourniquet-related pain was 25-30% in all three groups and not related to the prilocaine concentration. In conclusion, with 40 ml injection volume the 0.75% solution of prilocaine offers the optimal relation between incidence of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7813,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","volume":"25 1","pages":"59-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm and foot using 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 percent prilocaine].\",\"authors\":\"T Prien, C Goeters\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quality of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication are competing principles in IVRA. To evaluate the optimal prilocaine concentration with injection of 40 ml, 300 patients were randomly allocated to receive either a 0.5 (PRI 0.5), 0.75 (PRI 0.5) or a 1.0 (PRI 1.0) per cent solution. Using PRI 0.5, fifteen patients required supplementary fentanyl, with PRI 0.75 one, and with PRI 1.0 two (p less than or equal to 0.05). General anaesthesia proved necessary in three patients of the PRI 0.5 and 0.75 groups, respectively, and in one patient of the PRI 1.0 group (NS). With PRI 1.0 seven patients had subjective signs of intoxication upon tourniquet release, with PRI 0.75 none, and with PRI 0.5 one (p less than or equal to 0.05). Objective symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity were not observed. The incidence of tourniquet-related pain was 25-30% in all three groups and not related to the prilocaine concentration. In conclusion, with 40 ml injection volume the 0.75% solution of prilocaine offers the optimal relation between incidence of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"59-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
麻醉质量和中毒风险是IVRA中相互竞争的原则。为了评估40 ml注射时的最佳丙罗卡因浓度,300名患者被随机分配接受0.5 (PRI 0.5), 0.75 (PRI 0.5)或1.0 (PRI 1.0) %的溶液。使用PRI 0.5时,15例患者需要补充芬太尼,PRI 0.75 1例,PRI 1.0 2例(p小于或等于0.05)。pr0.5和0.75组分别有3例患者需要全身麻醉,pr1.0组有1例患者需要全身麻醉。当PRI为1.0时,7例患者止血带释放后出现主观中毒症状,PRI为0.75的患者无中毒症状,PRI为0.5的患者有中毒症状(p小于或等于0.05)。未观察局部麻醉毒性的客观症状。止血带相关疼痛的发生率在所有三组中均为25-30%,与丙胺卡因浓度无关。综上所述,0.75%浓度的丙罗卡因在40 ml注射量下,麻醉发生率与中毒风险之间的关系最优。
[Intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm and foot using 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 percent prilocaine].
Quality of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication are competing principles in IVRA. To evaluate the optimal prilocaine concentration with injection of 40 ml, 300 patients were randomly allocated to receive either a 0.5 (PRI 0.5), 0.75 (PRI 0.5) or a 1.0 (PRI 1.0) per cent solution. Using PRI 0.5, fifteen patients required supplementary fentanyl, with PRI 0.75 one, and with PRI 1.0 two (p less than or equal to 0.05). General anaesthesia proved necessary in three patients of the PRI 0.5 and 0.75 groups, respectively, and in one patient of the PRI 1.0 group (NS). With PRI 1.0 seven patients had subjective signs of intoxication upon tourniquet release, with PRI 0.75 none, and with PRI 0.5 one (p less than or equal to 0.05). Objective symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity were not observed. The incidence of tourniquet-related pain was 25-30% in all three groups and not related to the prilocaine concentration. In conclusion, with 40 ml injection volume the 0.75% solution of prilocaine offers the optimal relation between incidence of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication.