{"title":"气候变化文化战争的下一步是什么?","authors":"Ed Atkins","doi":"10.1088/2752-5295/aced62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n [Extract from Introduction] This perspective details how objects and technologies, like the gas stove, are becoming key sites where climate policy is located within broader politically-charged ‘culture wars’. Within this process, climate policies are inscribed with new meanings that position groups against one another. While concerns about gas stoves were linked to public health, they were presented by detractors as representative of climate action. One Fox News article argued that: “These Leftists don't give a damn about everyday Americans… Barking orders is their favorite indoor activity. And if total control buys them a holier spot in Climatarian Heaven, even better.” [2] Whilst gas stove emissions aren’t necessarily significant to fulfilling national emission reductions, any potential regulation will shift domestic energy use – due to the technology being used in close to 40% of US homes [3]. This episode illuminates an emergent shift in the narratives adopted by those opposing climate action. Rather than being primarily sceptical about climate change and mitigation and adaptation policies, political figures are working to link climate action to broader ideological battles about the economy, society, and identity. Within such battles, new objects will become key ‘artefacts’ in the climate change culture wars – becoming infused with new meanings as they emerge or are phased out. These must be understood further as failing to do so can open future environmental and climate policy to backlash, polarisation, and opposition.","PeriodicalId":432508,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Climate","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What next for the climate change culture wars?\",\"authors\":\"Ed Atkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2752-5295/aced62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n [Extract from Introduction] This perspective details how objects and technologies, like the gas stove, are becoming key sites where climate policy is located within broader politically-charged ‘culture wars’. Within this process, climate policies are inscribed with new meanings that position groups against one another. While concerns about gas stoves were linked to public health, they were presented by detractors as representative of climate action. One Fox News article argued that: “These Leftists don't give a damn about everyday Americans… Barking orders is their favorite indoor activity. And if total control buys them a holier spot in Climatarian Heaven, even better.” [2] Whilst gas stove emissions aren’t necessarily significant to fulfilling national emission reductions, any potential regulation will shift domestic energy use – due to the technology being used in close to 40% of US homes [3]. This episode illuminates an emergent shift in the narratives adopted by those opposing climate action. Rather than being primarily sceptical about climate change and mitigation and adaptation policies, political figures are working to link climate action to broader ideological battles about the economy, society, and identity. Within such battles, new objects will become key ‘artefacts’ in the climate change culture wars – becoming infused with new meanings as they emerge or are phased out. These must be understood further as failing to do so can open future environmental and climate policy to backlash, polarisation, and opposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research: Climate\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research: Climate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/aced62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/aced62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Extract from Introduction] This perspective details how objects and technologies, like the gas stove, are becoming key sites where climate policy is located within broader politically-charged ‘culture wars’. Within this process, climate policies are inscribed with new meanings that position groups against one another. While concerns about gas stoves were linked to public health, they were presented by detractors as representative of climate action. One Fox News article argued that: “These Leftists don't give a damn about everyday Americans… Barking orders is their favorite indoor activity. And if total control buys them a holier spot in Climatarian Heaven, even better.” [2] Whilst gas stove emissions aren’t necessarily significant to fulfilling national emission reductions, any potential regulation will shift domestic energy use – due to the technology being used in close to 40% of US homes [3]. This episode illuminates an emergent shift in the narratives adopted by those opposing climate action. Rather than being primarily sceptical about climate change and mitigation and adaptation policies, political figures are working to link climate action to broader ideological battles about the economy, society, and identity. Within such battles, new objects will become key ‘artefacts’ in the climate change culture wars – becoming infused with new meanings as they emerge or are phased out. These must be understood further as failing to do so can open future environmental and climate policy to backlash, polarisation, and opposition.