我不知道这是被禁止的——在线课程中的学术不诚实

Y. Eshet, Y. Peled, K. Grinautski
{"title":"我不知道这是被禁止的——在线课程中的学术不诚实","authors":"Y. Eshet, Y. Peled, K. Grinautski","doi":"10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a disagreement among researchers in regard to academic dishonesty in online as compared to traditional learning settings. Based on this, the aim of the current study was to investigate the connection between academic dishonesty in the virtual versus face-to face teaching/learning settings in relation to students' learning motivation, while examining the phenomenon from a cross-cultural perspective. The sample consisted of 1,574 participants - 803 from USA and 771 from Israel. The results showed that there are significant differences in students' likelihood to engage in academic dishonesty based on the type of course, such that students in face-to-face courses are more likely to engage in acts of academic dishonesty than their counterparts in online courses. In addition, it was found that students' propensity to engage in academic dishonesty is explained by motivational orientation, type of course, and age. The findings were consistent across student groups in both countries. The phenomenon can be explained by the fact that more intrinsically motivated students self-select online as opposed to traditional classroom courses, and because online instruction facilitates increasing levels of intrinsic motivation.","PeriodicalId":221511,"journal":{"name":"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I did not know its prohibited - Academic dishonesty in online courses\",\"authors\":\"Y. Eshet, Y. Peled, K. Grinautski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a disagreement among researchers in regard to academic dishonesty in online as compared to traditional learning settings. Based on this, the aim of the current study was to investigate the connection between academic dishonesty in the virtual versus face-to face teaching/learning settings in relation to students' learning motivation, while examining the phenomenon from a cross-cultural perspective. The sample consisted of 1,574 participants - 803 from USA and 771 from Israel. The results showed that there are significant differences in students' likelihood to engage in academic dishonesty based on the type of course, such that students in face-to-face courses are more likely to engage in acts of academic dishonesty than their counterparts in online courses. In addition, it was found that students' propensity to engage in academic dishonesty is explained by motivational orientation, type of course, and age. The findings were consistent across student groups in both countries. The phenomenon can be explained by the fact that more intrinsically motivated students self-select online as opposed to traditional classroom courses, and because online instruction facilitates increasing levels of intrinsic motivation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 6th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2012.6398533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

与传统学习环境相比,研究人员在网上学术不诚实方面存在分歧。基于此,本研究的目的是从跨文化的角度考察虚拟和面对面教学环境中学术不诚实与学生学习动机之间的关系。样本由1574名参与者组成,其中803名来自美国,771名来自以色列。结果显示,不同课程类型的学生学术不诚实行为的可能性存在显著差异,面对面课程的学生比在线课程的学生更容易发生学术不诚实行为。此外,我们发现学生的学术不诚实倾向与动机取向、课程类型和年龄有关。这一发现在两国的学生群体中是一致的。这种现象可以用以下事实来解释:与传统的课堂课程相比,更多具有内在动机的学生在网上自主选择课程,而且在线教学有助于提高内在动机的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
I did not know its prohibited - Academic dishonesty in online courses
There is a disagreement among researchers in regard to academic dishonesty in online as compared to traditional learning settings. Based on this, the aim of the current study was to investigate the connection between academic dishonesty in the virtual versus face-to face teaching/learning settings in relation to students' learning motivation, while examining the phenomenon from a cross-cultural perspective. The sample consisted of 1,574 participants - 803 from USA and 771 from Israel. The results showed that there are significant differences in students' likelihood to engage in academic dishonesty based on the type of course, such that students in face-to-face courses are more likely to engage in acts of academic dishonesty than their counterparts in online courses. In addition, it was found that students' propensity to engage in academic dishonesty is explained by motivational orientation, type of course, and age. The findings were consistent across student groups in both countries. The phenomenon can be explained by the fact that more intrinsically motivated students self-select online as opposed to traditional classroom courses, and because online instruction facilitates increasing levels of intrinsic motivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信