激励监管中的全要素生产率基准:来自捷克天然气公用事业的证据及其对后共产主义国家的影响

O. Machek, Jiří Hnilica
{"title":"激励监管中的全要素生产率基准:来自捷克天然气公用事业的证据及其对后共产主义国家的影响","authors":"O. Machek, Jiří Hnilica","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2376137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incentive regulation and regulatory benchmarking are becoming frequently used tools in tariff regulation of public utilities, including natural gas distribution companies. Firstly, we dealt with the principles of incentive regulation and total factor productivity measurement. Then, we discussed the international experience with TFP benchmarking and possible weaknesses of the TFP approach and sources of errors and misinterpretation of results. Further, we determined the productivity development of the Czech regional gas distribution companies in the period 2001-2011 using Fisher index and partial factor productivity analysis. Finally, we summarise the assumptions and measures which should be taken in order to apply TFP benchmarking in practice. We do not recommend using TFP-based tariff setting in the Czech Republic, nor in other post-communist countries. In particular, we argue that the events which took place in the period under consideration resulted in a distortion of available data which disallow their efficient use in tariff regulation at the present time and in the near future. We suggest using the TFP approach rather as an underlying method for further analysis and tariff setting.","PeriodicalId":336186,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Developing World (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total Factor Productivity Benchmarking in Incentive Regulation: Evidence from Czech Gas Utilities and Implications for Post-Communist Countries\",\"authors\":\"O. Machek, Jiří Hnilica\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2376137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Incentive regulation and regulatory benchmarking are becoming frequently used tools in tariff regulation of public utilities, including natural gas distribution companies. Firstly, we dealt with the principles of incentive regulation and total factor productivity measurement. Then, we discussed the international experience with TFP benchmarking and possible weaknesses of the TFP approach and sources of errors and misinterpretation of results. Further, we determined the productivity development of the Czech regional gas distribution companies in the period 2001-2011 using Fisher index and partial factor productivity analysis. Finally, we summarise the assumptions and measures which should be taken in order to apply TFP benchmarking in practice. We do not recommend using TFP-based tariff setting in the Czech Republic, nor in other post-communist countries. In particular, we argue that the events which took place in the period under consideration resulted in a distortion of available data which disallow their efficient use in tariff regulation at the present time and in the near future. We suggest using the TFP approach rather as an underlying method for further analysis and tariff setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Developing World (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Developing World (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Developing World (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激励性监管和监管基准正成为包括天然气分销公司在内的公用事业的关税监管中经常使用的工具。首先,我们讨论了激励调节和全要素生产率度量的原理。然后,我们讨论了TFP基准的国际经验,TFP方法可能存在的弱点以及错误和结果误解的来源。此外,我们利用Fisher指数和部分要素生产率分析确定了捷克区域天然气分销公司在2001-2011年期间的生产率发展。最后,总结了在实践中应用全要素生产率标杆管理应采取的假设和措施。我们不建议在捷克共和国或其他后共产主义国家使用基于tfp的关税设置。特别是,我们认为,在审议期间发生的事件导致了现有数据的扭曲,这使得它们无法在当前和不久的将来在关税监管中得到有效利用。我们建议使用TFP方法,而不是作为进一步分析和关税设定的基本方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Total Factor Productivity Benchmarking in Incentive Regulation: Evidence from Czech Gas Utilities and Implications for Post-Communist Countries
Incentive regulation and regulatory benchmarking are becoming frequently used tools in tariff regulation of public utilities, including natural gas distribution companies. Firstly, we dealt with the principles of incentive regulation and total factor productivity measurement. Then, we discussed the international experience with TFP benchmarking and possible weaknesses of the TFP approach and sources of errors and misinterpretation of results. Further, we determined the productivity development of the Czech regional gas distribution companies in the period 2001-2011 using Fisher index and partial factor productivity analysis. Finally, we summarise the assumptions and measures which should be taken in order to apply TFP benchmarking in practice. We do not recommend using TFP-based tariff setting in the Czech Republic, nor in other post-communist countries. In particular, we argue that the events which took place in the period under consideration resulted in a distortion of available data which disallow their efficient use in tariff regulation at the present time and in the near future. We suggest using the TFP approach rather as an underlying method for further analysis and tariff setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信