A. Landwehr, N. Solomon, Susan Sanelli-Russo, V. Rizzo
{"title":"《追逐斑马:在一、众和追求知识之间做出选择》","authors":"A. Landwehr, N. Solomon, Susan Sanelli-Russo, V. Rizzo","doi":"10.29011/2638-003x.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the challenges clinicians face between academic exploration, the good of the patient and the good of the many. This ethical debate was recently prompted by a case in which a rare disease was strongly suspected, but for which confirmation would potentially require unnecessary and arguably harmful intervention that would be unlikely to change management or prognosis. We explore some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding situations like these, namely weighing academic interest and potential benefit to the medical community and future patients against the risk of harm to patients, whose health we have vowed to protect.","PeriodicalId":431682,"journal":{"name":"Current trends in Internal Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chasing the Zebras: Choosing Between the One, the Many, and the Pursuit of Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"A. Landwehr, N. Solomon, Susan Sanelli-Russo, V. Rizzo\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2638-003x.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the challenges clinicians face between academic exploration, the good of the patient and the good of the many. This ethical debate was recently prompted by a case in which a rare disease was strongly suspected, but for which confirmation would potentially require unnecessary and arguably harmful intervention that would be unlikely to change management or prognosis. We explore some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding situations like these, namely weighing academic interest and potential benefit to the medical community and future patients against the risk of harm to patients, whose health we have vowed to protect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current trends in Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current trends in Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2638-003x.100046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current trends in Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2638-003x.100046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chasing the Zebras: Choosing Between the One, the Many, and the Pursuit of Knowledge
This article discusses the challenges clinicians face between academic exploration, the good of the patient and the good of the many. This ethical debate was recently prompted by a case in which a rare disease was strongly suspected, but for which confirmation would potentially require unnecessary and arguably harmful intervention that would be unlikely to change management or prognosis. We explore some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding situations like these, namely weighing academic interest and potential benefit to the medical community and future patients against the risk of harm to patients, whose health we have vowed to protect.