《追逐斑马:在一、众和追求知识之间做出选择》

A. Landwehr, N. Solomon, Susan Sanelli-Russo, V. Rizzo
{"title":"《追逐斑马:在一、众和追求知识之间做出选择》","authors":"A. Landwehr, N. Solomon, Susan Sanelli-Russo, V. Rizzo","doi":"10.29011/2638-003x.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the challenges clinicians face between academic exploration, the good of the patient and the good of the many. This ethical debate was recently prompted by a case in which a rare disease was strongly suspected, but for which confirmation would potentially require unnecessary and arguably harmful intervention that would be unlikely to change management or prognosis. We explore some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding situations like these, namely weighing academic interest and potential benefit to the medical community and future patients against the risk of harm to patients, whose health we have vowed to protect.","PeriodicalId":431682,"journal":{"name":"Current trends in Internal Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chasing the Zebras: Choosing Between the One, the Many, and the Pursuit of Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"A. Landwehr, N. Solomon, Susan Sanelli-Russo, V. Rizzo\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2638-003x.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the challenges clinicians face between academic exploration, the good of the patient and the good of the many. This ethical debate was recently prompted by a case in which a rare disease was strongly suspected, but for which confirmation would potentially require unnecessary and arguably harmful intervention that would be unlikely to change management or prognosis. We explore some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding situations like these, namely weighing academic interest and potential benefit to the medical community and future patients against the risk of harm to patients, whose health we have vowed to protect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current trends in Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current trends in Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2638-003x.100046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current trends in Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2638-003x.100046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了临床医生面临的挑战之间的学术探索,病人的利益和许多人的利益。最近,一个病例引发了这一伦理辩论,该病例强烈怀疑患有一种罕见疾病,但对这种疾病的确认可能需要不必要的、可能有害的干预,而且不太可能改变治疗或预后。我们探讨了围绕这些情况的一些伦理困境,即权衡学术利益和对医学界和未来患者的潜在利益,以及对患者的伤害风险,我们发誓要保护他们的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chasing the Zebras: Choosing Between the One, the Many, and the Pursuit of Knowledge
This article discusses the challenges clinicians face between academic exploration, the good of the patient and the good of the many. This ethical debate was recently prompted by a case in which a rare disease was strongly suspected, but for which confirmation would potentially require unnecessary and arguably harmful intervention that would be unlikely to change management or prognosis. We explore some of the ethical dilemmas surrounding situations like these, namely weighing academic interest and potential benefit to the medical community and future patients against the risk of harm to patients, whose health we have vowed to protect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信