{"title":"沉浸式虚拟现实与网络摄像头在在线语言课程中的对比","authors":"Borja Herrera","doi":"10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual\n Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish\n distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine\n the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and\n the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency\n relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence.\n To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted.\n Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking\n exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the\n second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether\n the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However,\n the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR\n volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR\n could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and\n communicative teaching pedagogies2.","PeriodicalId":350173,"journal":{"name":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immersive virtual reality versus webcam in an online language\\n course\",\"authors\":\"Borja Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual\\n Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish\\n distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine\\n the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and\\n the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency\\n relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence.\\n To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted.\\n Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking\\n exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the\\n second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether\\n the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However,\\n the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR\\n volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR\\n could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and\\n communicative teaching pedagogies2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immersive virtual reality versus webcam in an online language
course
This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual
Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish
distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine
the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and
the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency
relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence.
To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted.
Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking
exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the
second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether
the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However,
the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR
volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR
could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and
communicative teaching pedagogies2.