《异议谱系:二十世纪的美南浸信会抗议》作者:大卫·斯特里克林

R. Burns-Watson
{"title":"《异议谱系:二十世纪的美南浸信会抗议》作者:大卫·斯特里克林","authors":"R. Burns-Watson","doi":"10.5860/choice.37-5627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Baptists began as dissenters, a witness that placed them outside of the mainstream of society and cost many of them their lives. A Genealogy of Dissent draws upon that tradition of protest and how it has been maintained by some twentieth-century Southern Baptists. Stricklin bases his work on two major assumptions about Southern Baptists. First, as a group, they have abandoned their heritage as dissenters in favor of becoming the status quo in southern society. Second, even accounting for a congregational polity that allows for individual and congregational freedom, Southern Baptists are something of a monolith. Thus, a Southern Baptist culture exists and can be labeled as politically and theologically conservative because it is more ~oncerned with saving souls for the life to come than with addressing the social problems faced by many in this world. A Genealogy of Dissent is a history of Southern Baptists who were interested in challenging the status quo and who did express a concern for issues of social justice such as racism, sexism, and peace making. Stricklin acknowledges that certain organizations within the structure of the Southern Baptist Convention have tried to speak about poverty and race relations. Dissenters from outside the formal power structure of the SBC, however, have led the real challenges-men and women like Walt Johnson, Martin England, Clarence Jordan, Will Campbell, Martha Gilmore, Carlyle Marney, and Addie Davis are easily counted among those ranks. Many of these names are not widely known, even in church history circles, but they represent to Stricklin people who tried to be faithful to the biblical call for justice and to the dissenting heritage of Baptists. This book is a valuable resource for those who want to begin to explore the diversity that exists within the Southern Baptist Convention. It lifts up and affirms the contributions of men and women who have in many ways been ignored or forgotten. But the text does have some inherent tensions that, while not fatal, raise some important questions. First, Stricklin seems to gloss over the congregational heritage in favor of the dissenting one, accepting a somewhat monolithic definition of Southern Baptists without giving enough consideration to the diversity that a congregational polity allows. While it is possible to read the story of Walt Johnson, among others, as being one of dissenters, it is equally plausible that they are proof that Southern Baptists simply cannot easily be labeled and defined. Second, even the idea of dissenters begins to unravel as Stricklin explores the fundamentalist takeover of the SBC in the 1980s. At one point he remarks that the fundamentalists are in fact dissenters themselves, just better organized to take control of the Convention. This raises the question of whether in reality all Southern Baptists are dissenters. If so, what makes Stricklin's group so different from the rest of their Southern Baptist sisters and brothers? This is an important work in helping to redefine an influential group of American Protestants. It challenges scholars to recognize that old assumptions about Southern Baptists may not be as accurate as we once thought. Stricklin has opened the door for others to explore the richness and diversity of Southern Baptists in the twentieth century. Let us hope that others will open it even further.","PeriodicalId":338407,"journal":{"name":"Ohio Valley History","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Genealogy of Dissent: Southern Baptist Protest in the Twentieth Century by David Stricklin (review)\",\"authors\":\"R. Burns-Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.37-5627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Baptists began as dissenters, a witness that placed them outside of the mainstream of society and cost many of them their lives. A Genealogy of Dissent draws upon that tradition of protest and how it has been maintained by some twentieth-century Southern Baptists. Stricklin bases his work on two major assumptions about Southern Baptists. First, as a group, they have abandoned their heritage as dissenters in favor of becoming the status quo in southern society. Second, even accounting for a congregational polity that allows for individual and congregational freedom, Southern Baptists are something of a monolith. Thus, a Southern Baptist culture exists and can be labeled as politically and theologically conservative because it is more ~oncerned with saving souls for the life to come than with addressing the social problems faced by many in this world. A Genealogy of Dissent is a history of Southern Baptists who were interested in challenging the status quo and who did express a concern for issues of social justice such as racism, sexism, and peace making. Stricklin acknowledges that certain organizations within the structure of the Southern Baptist Convention have tried to speak about poverty and race relations. Dissenters from outside the formal power structure of the SBC, however, have led the real challenges-men and women like Walt Johnson, Martin England, Clarence Jordan, Will Campbell, Martha Gilmore, Carlyle Marney, and Addie Davis are easily counted among those ranks. Many of these names are not widely known, even in church history circles, but they represent to Stricklin people who tried to be faithful to the biblical call for justice and to the dissenting heritage of Baptists. This book is a valuable resource for those who want to begin to explore the diversity that exists within the Southern Baptist Convention. It lifts up and affirms the contributions of men and women who have in many ways been ignored or forgotten. But the text does have some inherent tensions that, while not fatal, raise some important questions. First, Stricklin seems to gloss over the congregational heritage in favor of the dissenting one, accepting a somewhat monolithic definition of Southern Baptists without giving enough consideration to the diversity that a congregational polity allows. While it is possible to read the story of Walt Johnson, among others, as being one of dissenters, it is equally plausible that they are proof that Southern Baptists simply cannot easily be labeled and defined. Second, even the idea of dissenters begins to unravel as Stricklin explores the fundamentalist takeover of the SBC in the 1980s. At one point he remarks that the fundamentalists are in fact dissenters themselves, just better organized to take control of the Convention. This raises the question of whether in reality all Southern Baptists are dissenters. If so, what makes Stricklin's group so different from the rest of their Southern Baptist sisters and brothers? This is an important work in helping to redefine an influential group of American Protestants. It challenges scholars to recognize that old assumptions about Southern Baptists may not be as accurate as we once thought. Stricklin has opened the door for others to explore the richness and diversity of Southern Baptists in the twentieth century. Let us hope that others will open it even further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio Valley History\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio Valley History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-5627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio Valley History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-5627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浸信会教徒一开始是持不同政见者,他们的见证使他们置身于社会主流之外,许多人因此丧命。《异议谱系》借鉴了这种抗议的传统,以及一些20世纪的美南浸信会教徒是如何保持这种传统的。斯特里克林的研究基于对美南浸信会的两个主要假设。首先,作为一个群体,他们已经放弃了作为持不同政见者的传统,转而支持成为南方社会的现状。其次,即使考虑到允许个人和教会自由的教会政体,美南浸信会也算是一个庞然大物。因此,美南浸信会文化的存在,可以被贴上政治和神学保守的标签,因为它更关心为来世拯救灵魂,而不是解决这个世界上许多人面临的社会问题。《异议宗谱》是一部关于美南浸信会教徒的历史,他们对挑战现状感兴趣,并表达了对种族主义、性别歧视和和平等社会正义问题的关注。斯特里克林承认,美南浸信会内部的某些组织试图谈论贫困和种族关系。然而,来自SBC正式权力结构之外的异见者领导了真正的挑战——像沃尔特·约翰逊、马丁·英格兰、克拉伦斯·乔丹、威尔·坎贝尔、玛莎·吉尔摩、卡莱尔·马尼和阿迪·戴维斯这样的男人和女人很容易被列入这些行列。其中许多人的名字并不广为人知,甚至在教会历史圈也不为人所知,但对斯特里克林来说,他们代表了那些努力忠实于圣经中正义的呼吁和浸信会的不同传统的人。这本书是一个宝贵的资源,为那些谁想要开始探索存在于美南浸信会公约的多样性。它提升并肯定了在许多方面被忽视或遗忘的男男女女的贡献。但文本确实有一些内在的紧张,虽然不是致命的,但提出了一些重要的问题。首先,斯特里克林似乎掩盖了教会的传统,支持持不同意见的人,接受了美南浸信会的某种单一定义,而没有充分考虑到教会政体所允许的多样性。虽然我们可以把沃尔特·约翰逊(Walt Johnson)等人的故事解读为持不同政见者之一,但同样有道理的是,这些故事证明了美南浸信会教徒不容易被贴上标签和定义。其次,就连持不同政见者的概念也开始瓦解,因为斯特里克林探讨了20世纪80年代原教旨主义者对SBC的接管。他一度评论说,原教旨主义者实际上本身就是持不同政见者,只是更好地组织起来控制公会。这就提出了一个问题,是否在现实中所有的美南浸信会教徒都是持不同政见者。如果是这样,是什么使斯特里克林的团体与其他南方浸信会的姐妹和兄弟如此不同?这是帮助重新定义一个有影响力的美国新教徒群体的重要工作。它挑战了学者们认识到,关于美南浸信会的旧假设可能并不像我们曾经认为的那样准确。斯特里克林为其他人打开了探索20世纪美南浸信会的丰富性和多样性的大门。让我们希望其他国家能进一步开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Genealogy of Dissent: Southern Baptist Protest in the Twentieth Century by David Stricklin (review)
Baptists began as dissenters, a witness that placed them outside of the mainstream of society and cost many of them their lives. A Genealogy of Dissent draws upon that tradition of protest and how it has been maintained by some twentieth-century Southern Baptists. Stricklin bases his work on two major assumptions about Southern Baptists. First, as a group, they have abandoned their heritage as dissenters in favor of becoming the status quo in southern society. Second, even accounting for a congregational polity that allows for individual and congregational freedom, Southern Baptists are something of a monolith. Thus, a Southern Baptist culture exists and can be labeled as politically and theologically conservative because it is more ~oncerned with saving souls for the life to come than with addressing the social problems faced by many in this world. A Genealogy of Dissent is a history of Southern Baptists who were interested in challenging the status quo and who did express a concern for issues of social justice such as racism, sexism, and peace making. Stricklin acknowledges that certain organizations within the structure of the Southern Baptist Convention have tried to speak about poverty and race relations. Dissenters from outside the formal power structure of the SBC, however, have led the real challenges-men and women like Walt Johnson, Martin England, Clarence Jordan, Will Campbell, Martha Gilmore, Carlyle Marney, and Addie Davis are easily counted among those ranks. Many of these names are not widely known, even in church history circles, but they represent to Stricklin people who tried to be faithful to the biblical call for justice and to the dissenting heritage of Baptists. This book is a valuable resource for those who want to begin to explore the diversity that exists within the Southern Baptist Convention. It lifts up and affirms the contributions of men and women who have in many ways been ignored or forgotten. But the text does have some inherent tensions that, while not fatal, raise some important questions. First, Stricklin seems to gloss over the congregational heritage in favor of the dissenting one, accepting a somewhat monolithic definition of Southern Baptists without giving enough consideration to the diversity that a congregational polity allows. While it is possible to read the story of Walt Johnson, among others, as being one of dissenters, it is equally plausible that they are proof that Southern Baptists simply cannot easily be labeled and defined. Second, even the idea of dissenters begins to unravel as Stricklin explores the fundamentalist takeover of the SBC in the 1980s. At one point he remarks that the fundamentalists are in fact dissenters themselves, just better organized to take control of the Convention. This raises the question of whether in reality all Southern Baptists are dissenters. If so, what makes Stricklin's group so different from the rest of their Southern Baptist sisters and brothers? This is an important work in helping to redefine an influential group of American Protestants. It challenges scholars to recognize that old assumptions about Southern Baptists may not be as accurate as we once thought. Stricklin has opened the door for others to explore the richness and diversity of Southern Baptists in the twentieth century. Let us hope that others will open it even further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信