{"title":"马尔萨斯与英国评论家","authors":"S. Rashid","doi":"10.1017/S1042771600005159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nineteen seventy nine was a good year for students of the Rev. T. R. Malthus. An evaluation of Malthus the demographer was provided by William Petersen, while Mrs. Patricia James wrote a marvellous biography of the Malthus the man, his times and his friends. Nonetheless, one can sympathize with Mark Blaug's comment that there are still many aspects of Malthus that elude us. One such aspect that needs resolution is why was Malthus not more actively involved with the Tory party between 1815-1830, when his own views tended so closely to support the bulwark of the Tory party, the landed classes. Was Malthus really too busy to write for the Quarterly Review, as he was asked to do? And if so, what was he so busy with? By drawing upon various points raised by Malthus' recent biographers as well as my own study of Anglican clergymen-economists in the period 1700-1850 I will suggest that Malthus was in fact busy during this period because he was writing the economic articles for the High-Church Anglican British Critic.","PeriodicalId":123974,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malthus and the British Critic\",\"authors\":\"S. Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1042771600005159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nineteen seventy nine was a good year for students of the Rev. T. R. Malthus. An evaluation of Malthus the demographer was provided by William Petersen, while Mrs. Patricia James wrote a marvellous biography of the Malthus the man, his times and his friends. Nonetheless, one can sympathize with Mark Blaug's comment that there are still many aspects of Malthus that elude us. One such aspect that needs resolution is why was Malthus not more actively involved with the Tory party between 1815-1830, when his own views tended so closely to support the bulwark of the Tory party, the landed classes. Was Malthus really too busy to write for the Quarterly Review, as he was asked to do? And if so, what was he so busy with? By drawing upon various points raised by Malthus' recent biographers as well as my own study of Anglican clergymen-economists in the period 1700-1850 I will suggest that Malthus was in fact busy during this period because he was writing the economic articles for the High-Church Anglican British Critic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics Society Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics Society Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600005159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600005159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
1979年对牧师t.r.马尔萨斯的学生来说是个好年头。威廉·彼得森(William Petersen)对人口学家马尔萨斯进行了评价,帕特丽夏·詹姆斯(Patricia James)夫人则为马尔萨斯本人、他的时代和他的朋友们写了一本精彩的传记。尽管如此,我们还是可以赞同马克·布劳格的评论,即马尔萨斯的许多方面仍然是我们无法理解的。其中一个需要解决的问题是,为什么马尔萨斯在1815年至1830年间没有更积极地参与托利党,而他自己的观点却倾向于支持托利党的堡垒,即地主阶级。马尔萨斯真的忙得没时间为《季刊评论》写稿吗?如果是这样,他在忙什么呢?通过引用马尔萨斯最近的传记作者提出的各种观点,以及我自己对1700-1850年间英国圣公会神职人员经济学家的研究,我将提出马尔萨斯在这一时期实际上很忙,因为他正在为《高教会英国圣公会评论家》(High-Church Anglican British Critic)撰写经济文章。
Nineteen seventy nine was a good year for students of the Rev. T. R. Malthus. An evaluation of Malthus the demographer was provided by William Petersen, while Mrs. Patricia James wrote a marvellous biography of the Malthus the man, his times and his friends. Nonetheless, one can sympathize with Mark Blaug's comment that there are still many aspects of Malthus that elude us. One such aspect that needs resolution is why was Malthus not more actively involved with the Tory party between 1815-1830, when his own views tended so closely to support the bulwark of the Tory party, the landed classes. Was Malthus really too busy to write for the Quarterly Review, as he was asked to do? And if so, what was he so busy with? By drawing upon various points raised by Malthus' recent biographers as well as my own study of Anglican clergymen-economists in the period 1700-1850 I will suggest that Malthus was in fact busy during this period because he was writing the economic articles for the High-Church Anglican British Critic.