{"title":"针对Windows中流行应用程序的远程代码执行漏洞的保护","authors":"Jeffrey Wu, A. Arrott, F. C. Osorio","doi":"10.1109/MALWARE.2014.6999416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of Malicious Remote Code Execution Exploits is to remotely execute code transparently to the user, and without relying on user interaction, in order to infect targeted machines. This comparative study examines the effectiveness of different proactive exploit mitigation technologies included in popular endpoint security products and specialized anti-exploit tools. The study focuses on exploits of popular applications running on Windows XP SP3 with Internet Explorer (IE8). As such, the Microsoft Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (MS-EMET) is used as a reference standard for all exploit mitigation solutions. The study compares the effectiveness of endpoint security products and anti-exploit tools by separating measurements of protections in common with MS-EMET from measures of protections supplemental to MS-EMET. This is done in order to understand not just the relative competitive effectiveness of the individual products and tools but also to understand the overall capabilities of the Windows endpoint security solutions to combat the remote code execution exploit capabilities of the overall Windows malware ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":151942,"journal":{"name":"2014 9th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software: The Americas (MALWARE)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection against remote code execution exploits of popular applications in Windows\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Wu, A. Arrott, F. C. Osorio\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MALWARE.2014.6999416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of Malicious Remote Code Execution Exploits is to remotely execute code transparently to the user, and without relying on user interaction, in order to infect targeted machines. This comparative study examines the effectiveness of different proactive exploit mitigation technologies included in popular endpoint security products and specialized anti-exploit tools. The study focuses on exploits of popular applications running on Windows XP SP3 with Internet Explorer (IE8). As such, the Microsoft Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (MS-EMET) is used as a reference standard for all exploit mitigation solutions. The study compares the effectiveness of endpoint security products and anti-exploit tools by separating measurements of protections in common with MS-EMET from measures of protections supplemental to MS-EMET. This is done in order to understand not just the relative competitive effectiveness of the individual products and tools but also to understand the overall capabilities of the Windows endpoint security solutions to combat the remote code execution exploit capabilities of the overall Windows malware ecosystem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 9th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software: The Americas (MALWARE)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 9th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software: The Americas (MALWARE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALWARE.2014.6999416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 9th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software: The Americas (MALWARE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MALWARE.2014.6999416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
恶意远程代码执行漏洞的目标是对用户透明地远程执行代码,而不依赖于用户交互,以感染目标机器。本比较研究检查了流行端点安全产品和专用反漏洞利用工具中包含的不同主动漏洞利用缓解技术的有效性。这项研究的重点是在Windows XP SP3和ie (IE8)上运行的流行应用程序的漏洞。因此,Microsoft增强缓解体验工具包(MS-EMET)被用作所有漏洞缓解解决方案的参考标准。该研究通过将与MS-EMET共同的保护措施与MS-EMET补充的保护措施分开,比较了端点安全产品和反漏洞利用工具的有效性。这样做不仅是为了了解单个产品和工具的相对竞争效率,也是为了了解Windows端点安全解决方案的整体能力,以对抗整个Windows恶意软件生态系统的远程代码执行利用能力。
Protection against remote code execution exploits of popular applications in Windows
The objective of Malicious Remote Code Execution Exploits is to remotely execute code transparently to the user, and without relying on user interaction, in order to infect targeted machines. This comparative study examines the effectiveness of different proactive exploit mitigation technologies included in popular endpoint security products and specialized anti-exploit tools. The study focuses on exploits of popular applications running on Windows XP SP3 with Internet Explorer (IE8). As such, the Microsoft Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (MS-EMET) is used as a reference standard for all exploit mitigation solutions. The study compares the effectiveness of endpoint security products and anti-exploit tools by separating measurements of protections in common with MS-EMET from measures of protections supplemental to MS-EMET. This is done in order to understand not just the relative competitive effectiveness of the individual products and tools but also to understand the overall capabilities of the Windows endpoint security solutions to combat the remote code execution exploit capabilities of the overall Windows malware ecosystem.