一、二理科生学术论文文体特征的多维分析

Yaoyao Ma
{"title":"一、二理科生学术论文文体特征的多维分析","authors":"Yaoyao Ma","doi":"10.26480/ess.01.2022.10.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve the academic English writing level of domestic science scholars and speed up the process of internationalization of my country’s academic achievements, we selected 150 scientific academic papers respectively written by Chinese and English scholars from international authoritative journals to build a self-built comparative corpus, and used Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis model to compare these papers. The research results found that: first, there are significant differences in the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth dimensions of Chinese and English scholars’ science academic papers; second, Chinese scholars’ science academic papers have strong information abstraction , non-narrative, referential clarity and non-explicit persuasion; third, although Chinese scholars’ academic papers have a certain lexical richness and grammatical diversity at this stage, there is significant difference between Chinese and English scholars’ academic papers.","PeriodicalId":168185,"journal":{"name":"Education, Sustainability & Society","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF STYLISTIC FEATURES IN ACADEMIC PAPERS OF L1 AND L2 SCIENCE MAJORS\",\"authors\":\"Yaoyao Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.26480/ess.01.2022.10.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to improve the academic English writing level of domestic science scholars and speed up the process of internationalization of my country’s academic achievements, we selected 150 scientific academic papers respectively written by Chinese and English scholars from international authoritative journals to build a self-built comparative corpus, and used Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis model to compare these papers. The research results found that: first, there are significant differences in the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth dimensions of Chinese and English scholars’ science academic papers; second, Chinese scholars’ science academic papers have strong information abstraction , non-narrative, referential clarity and non-explicit persuasion; third, although Chinese scholars’ academic papers have a certain lexical richness and grammatical diversity at this stage, there is significant difference between Chinese and English scholars’ academic papers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education, Sustainability & Society\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education, Sustainability & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.01.2022.10.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education, Sustainability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.01.2022.10.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高国内科技学者的学术英语写作水平,加快我国学术成果国际化进程,我们选取了国际权威期刊中、英学者分别撰写的150篇科技学术论文,构建自建比较语料库,并采用Biber的多维分析模型对这些论文进行比较。研究结果发现:第一,中英学者的科学学术论文在第二、三、四、五、六维度上存在显著差异;第二,中国学者的科学学术论文具有较强的信息抽象性、非叙事性、参考清晰度和非显性说服力;第三,虽然中国学者的学术论文在这一阶段具有一定的词汇丰富性和语法多样性,但中英学者的学术论文存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF STYLISTIC FEATURES IN ACADEMIC PAPERS OF L1 AND L2 SCIENCE MAJORS
In order to improve the academic English writing level of domestic science scholars and speed up the process of internationalization of my country’s academic achievements, we selected 150 scientific academic papers respectively written by Chinese and English scholars from international authoritative journals to build a self-built comparative corpus, and used Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis model to compare these papers. The research results found that: first, there are significant differences in the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth dimensions of Chinese and English scholars’ science academic papers; second, Chinese scholars’ science academic papers have strong information abstraction , non-narrative, referential clarity and non-explicit persuasion; third, although Chinese scholars’ academic papers have a certain lexical richness and grammatical diversity at this stage, there is significant difference between Chinese and English scholars’ academic papers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信