{"title":"技能差距:技术变革的时机","authors":"Ziemowit Bednarek","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2280105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper generalizes the business cycle model in Jovanovic (2006) along two important and meaningful dimensions: i) more general utility function; ii) more realistic distribution properties of the productivity shocks. Unlike the original model, I assume the power utility function of the representative agent, and a non-zero expected value of the distribution of the shocks. I include the non-zero expected value of the productivity shocks to account for the skill-biased nature of the technical change in the post-war period. The model implies an endogenous time-varying technical change as an optimal investment policy, consistent with the data.","PeriodicalId":287196,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Macroeconomics (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skills Gap: The Timing of Technical Change\",\"authors\":\"Ziemowit Bednarek\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2280105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper generalizes the business cycle model in Jovanovic (2006) along two important and meaningful dimensions: i) more general utility function; ii) more realistic distribution properties of the productivity shocks. Unlike the original model, I assume the power utility function of the representative agent, and a non-zero expected value of the distribution of the shocks. I include the non-zero expected value of the productivity shocks to account for the skill-biased nature of the technical change in the post-war period. The model implies an endogenous time-varying technical change as an optimal investment policy, consistent with the data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Macroeconomics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRPN: Innovation & Macroeconomics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2280105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Macroeconomics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2280105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper generalizes the business cycle model in Jovanovic (2006) along two important and meaningful dimensions: i) more general utility function; ii) more realistic distribution properties of the productivity shocks. Unlike the original model, I assume the power utility function of the representative agent, and a non-zero expected value of the distribution of the shocks. I include the non-zero expected value of the productivity shocks to account for the skill-biased nature of the technical change in the post-war period. The model implies an endogenous time-varying technical change as an optimal investment policy, consistent with the data.